USPTO Hiring Freeze Ends, Patent Examiners Wanted

USPTO

USPTO Headquarters

Earlier today the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) posted job openings for patent examiners and trademark examining attorneys on USAJobs.gov.

The USPTO receiving authority by the Trump Administration to hire was no easy lift. IPWatchdog has learned that the USPTO has been tirelessly working with the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) for 4+ months in an effort to convince OPM to give the USPTO a waiver that would allow the Office to once again start hiring examiners.

The job postings that went live today are part of the USPTO’s effort to address the historic patent backlog left by the Biden Administration and to reduce ballooning pendency. The USPTO has already made great strides under the leadership of Acting Director Coke Stewart, with the pending, unexamined patent application backlog already dropping by 32,000. The addition of reinforcements to the examining corps. will undoubtedly help the USPTO bring the the overall inventory of unexamined patent applications down into the 500,000 range, as Stewart recently said was the goal.

The postings are opening on a rolling basis with positions in a variety of scientific disciplines, including: (1) biology; (2) biomedical engineering; (3) chemical engineering; (4) chemistry; (5) computer engineering; (6) computer science; (7) electrical engineering; (8) mechanical engineering; and (9) physics.

USPTO hiring commences as the Trump Administration continues to otherwise pursue efforts to downsize the federal government, efforts that have included the offering of severance to federal government workers and a government-wide hiring freeze. This hiring freeze lead to the USPTO retracting some 600 outstanding job offers to patent examiners earlier this year. Meanwhile, normal attrition in the patent examining corps. has continued. If the hiring freeze remained in place and normal attrition continued it would have placed an impossible burden on the USPTO leadership at a time when the agency is taking an “all hands on deck” approach to addressing the historic patent backlog and unacceptable pendency.

The USPTO, which is 100% user fee funded and does not take any taxpayer funding, now finds itself in an enviable position. With other federal agencies still facing a hiring freeze this may be a once in a generation opportunity for the USPTO to hire the best and brightest scientific and technical minds in the DC area, including many highly educated and well-trained former government workers who were released by other agencies over the last several months.

Share

Warning & Disclaimer: The pages, articles and comments on IPWatchdog.com do not constitute legal advice, nor do they create any attorney-client relationship. The articles published express the personal opinion and views of the author as of the time of publication and should not be attributed to the author’s employer, clients or the sponsors of IPWatchdog.com.

Join the Discussion

16 comments so far.

  • [Avatar for Anon]
    Anon
    June 23, 2025 06:16 pm

    examiner (and anyone else that might shed some light),

    My sticking point is less the “what” and more the “how,” as the USPTO has not bothered responding to my request to clarify exactly how examiners can be hired but essentially be prevented from joining the union.

    Has POPA addressed this? Have any examiners inquired?

  • [Avatar for John]
    John
    June 21, 2025 04:37 pm

    I would strongly not recommend the patent examiner job to anyone at this time. I suspect new examiner attrition is going to be much higher with this administration. I’m a primary and I receive no Other Time for helping other examiners. The SPE’s are overloaded with work and this will affect new examiner training and retention. This job is not for the weak. This job was hard enough before Trump. New examiners coming in now are going to be even more frustrated and stressed out with how things are being run now with the current PTO management and the Trump administration and the federal government in general (e.g, possible benefits being cut, higher benefit deductions in paychecks).

  • [Avatar for examiner]
    examiner
    June 20, 2025 10:32 am

    A more descriptive and correct title should read:

    “USPTO Hiring Freeze Ends, Non-Unionized, Fully On-Campus Patent Examiners Wanted”

  • [Avatar for Anon]
    Anon
    June 18, 2025 07:23 am

    Anyone else inquire with the USPTO how they can hire people as examiners and yet exclude those hires from participating in the union that represents examiners?

    Anyone else inquire and receive an answer? The USPTO has not responded to my request for clarification on this matter.

  • [Avatar for Pro Say]
    Pro Say
    June 16, 2025 07:19 pm

    . . . well . . . at least all the new examiners will have English as their first language

    Wait; what?! That won’t be a requirement!?

    Someone (or multiple someones) needs to immediately reach out the Trump team to be sure that English-first be a requirement for all new PTO hires.

    Unless we all want to drown in an ocean of mumbo-jumbo OAs.

  • [Avatar for Anon]
    Anon
    June 16, 2025 03:43 pm

    Thank you examiner – as Gene also indicates, this comes as a surprise, given how examiners generally have been exempt from RTO protocols issued by the current administration.

    Does not the Examiner Union already have an action filed against the USPTO due to the DOGE actions?

  • [Avatar for examiner]
    examiner
    June 16, 2025 11:19 am

    This statement is 100% correct:
    “The current postings have “NO” next to union representation and telework.”

  • [Avatar for IamI]
    IamI
    June 16, 2025 11:19 am

    They also say “Remote Job: No” and “Telework Eligible: No”.

  • [Avatar for IamI]
    IamI
    June 16, 2025 11:18 am

    Gene, the new announcements on USAJobs literally say “Bargaining Unit Status: No” and also say “This is a Non-Bargaining Unit position.”

  • [Avatar for Gene Quinn]
    Gene Quinn
    June 16, 2025 11:10 am

    I don’t believe that is correct. Examiners are members of the union. What the union and Office have done, however, is to agree that newly hired examiners must work on campus for the first year before they qualify for telework. This is almost certainly in large part to attempt to address the 40% attrition rate the Office experiences with examiners in the first year of employment.

  • [Avatar for examiner]
    examiner
    June 16, 2025 10:09 am

    Correct. The current postings have “NO” next to union representation and telework.

  • [Avatar for Engineer]
    Engineer
    June 16, 2025 09:56 am

    It’s unfortunate that none of the positions are remote.

  • [Avatar for Anon]
    Anon
    June 16, 2025 07:34 am

    examiner….

    Are you saying newly hired examiners are not covered under the examiner’s union?

  • [Avatar for Primexam]
    Primexam
    June 14, 2025 04:55 pm

    I had trouble following the announcement on USAJOBS but it looks like no telework, no union, possibly higher fers, and anyone who is top rated skips the interview?

    They aren’t going to get the best they are going to end up with the leftovers who don’t understand how raw a deal they are getting. And they won’t be able to weed out the applicants who on paper look good but in person are less than stellar.

    I predict a mess of incoherent actions and increased attrition.

  • [Avatar for examiner]
    examiner
    June 14, 2025 08:20 am

    “the best and brightest scientific and technical minds in the DC area, including many highly educated and well-trained former government workers who were released by other agencies over the last several months” may want to note that the posted positions offer no union protection and no telework guarantees.

  • [Avatar for Frustrated Patent Examiner]
    Frustrated Patent Examiner
    June 13, 2025 07:45 pm

    >Remote job
    >No

    >Telework eligible
    >No

    >Bargaining unit status
    >No

    Not only are they posting the position no longer has union protections (not sure how this works with POPA), but also with no remote option or eligibility for telework. It baffles me why this administration thinks remote work is bad when it opens the position to a vast pool of skilled individuals, especially in a position like this where production is literally tracked.
    This, I should note, follows on the heels of massive changes within the Office to “Other Time” (non-examining time) allocation, wherein new examiners are no longer able to consult with senior examiners for guidance on searching or writing an Office Action. SPEs (most of whom actually aren’t well acquainted in the art they are assigned to) have to now try to manage reviewing ~15 or more OAs while also trying to bring in these new hires.
    Attorneys should expect a massive drop in quality over the next few years, unless things are drastically changed.

Varsity Sponsors

IPWatchdog Events

Industry Events

PIUG 2026 Joint Annual and Biotechnology Conference
May 19 @ 8:00 am - May 21 @ 5:00 pm EDT
Certified Patent Valuation Analyst Training
May 28 @ 9:00 am - May 29 @ 5:00 pm EDT
2026 WIPO-U.S. Summer School on Intellectual Property
June 1 @ 9:00 am - June 12 @ 1:45 pm EDT

From IPWatchdog