Other Barks & Bites for Friday, February 13: CAFC Says NHK-Fintiv is General Policy Statement; Second Circuit Adopts Rule on Waiver of DMCA Safe Harbor; and Daren Tang Nominated for Second Term as WIPO Director

This week in Other Barks & Bites: the U.S. Copyright Office issues a three-year study on small claims filed at the Copyright Claims Board; Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick publicly retreats from a proposed value-based tax on U.S. patent grants; the Federal Circuit issues several precedential decisions including one nixing Apple’s appeal of the NHK-Fintiv framework for discretionary denials of IPR proceedings; and more.

Knobbe Martens is Seeking a Patent Scientist

Knobbe Martens is seeking a Patent Scientist in Computer Science/Electrical Engineering. Knobbe Martens provides an opportunity for engineers and scientists to further their professional growth and career development in exciting, challenging ways. Put your technical degree to work on issues involving science, technology, and the law. Candidates will assist with the successful procurement of patent protection for innovative technologies, evaluate the designs of new products, and assist with the evaluation of competitor products.

Arnold & Porter is Seeking a Senior Manager of IP Administration

Arnold & Porter is an international law firm with 16 offices in the United States, Europe, and Asia that provides sophisticated regulatory, litigation, and transactional services across multiple industries. Arnold & Porter has an opening for a Senior Manager of IP Administration in the Washington, DC office. The Senior Manager of IP Administration oversees the firmwide IP Prosecution (Patent and Trademark) practice.

Delaware Magistrate Judge Recommends Finding Nielsen Audience Measurement Patent Ineligible

A magistrate judge of the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware today issued a Report and Recommendation to grant a motion by VideoAmp, Inc. to dismiss The Nielsen Company (US) LLC’s complaint against it for infringement of Nielsen’s patents related to audience measurement systems because the patents are directed to ineligible subject matter… According to today’s opinion, the ‘402 patent is “generally directed to associating identified user data with media being displayed.”

District Court Invalidates Immervision Patent Claim in Suit Against Apple, Citing Single-Means Doctrine

The U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware on Wednesday granted a case-dispositive motion for judgment in favor of Apple Inc., finding the single patent claim asserted by Immervision, Inc., invalid for lack of enablement. In a memorandum opinion, U.S. District Judge Maryellen Noreika adopted a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation that Immervision’s claim was an impermissible “single-means claim,” a seldom-invoked doctrine of patent law. The ruling, which Judge Noreika noted would be case-dispositive, concluding the patent infringement suit that Immervision had brought against Apple.

UK Supreme Court Issues Milestone Judgment for AI and Software Patentability

The UK Supreme Court today issued a landmark judgment on AI patentability that is likely to impact all software patents going forward. The decision in Emotional Perception v. Comptroller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks primarily held that the approach taken in Aerotel Ltd v Telco Holdings Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 1371; [2007] Bus LR 634; [2007] RPC 7 (Aerotel) should no longer be followed. Under Aerotel, courts and examiners consider a four-step test for assessing whether a claim is excluded from patent eligibility: 1) properly construe the claim, 2) Identify the actual/ alleged contribution, 3) Ask whether the contribution is excluded and 4) check if the contribution is technical.

CAFC Affirms $84.8 Million Antitrust Verdict Against Ingevity in Patent Tying Case

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) today issued a precedential decision in Ingevity Corporation v. BASF Corporation, affirming a jury verdict that found Ingevity liable for unlawful tying under federal antitrust laws. On appeal, the CAFC upheld the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware’s decision to deny Ingevity’s post-trial motions for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL). As a result, the ruling included an award of more than $84 million in trebled damages to BASF Corporation (BASF). Judge Lourie authored the unanimous opinion, joined by Judges Prost and Cunningham.

Subscribe to IPWatchdog

This is the best way to stay informed. We send a daily roundup of our latest news, press releases, and events.

Get Email Updates