AI, Budget Cuts, and the Future of In-House Patent Teams | IPWatchdog Unleashed

It is hardly a secret that corporate IP departments are under growing pressure to do more with less. Budgets are tightening, leadership increasingly expects patents to deliver measurable business value, and artificial intelligence is rapidly changing how patent work can be performed. What does this mean for the future of in-house patent teams—and for the law firms that support them? Our conversation explores several major trends shaping patent strategy today, including the shift toward quality over quantity in patent portfolios, the growing emphasis on maintenance fee pruning and portfolio discipline, and the evolving relationship between in-house counsel and outside patent law firms. We also examine how companies are using competitive intelligence, patent analytics, and emerging tools to guide filing strategy, manage costs, and identify licensing and enforcement opportunities. We also tackle one of the biggest questions facing the IP profession: What can AI realistically do for patent practitioners today—and what can’t it do yet?

Harrity & Harrity is Seeking an Innovation Specialist – Patent Technology

Harrity & Harrity is seeking a motivated and detail-oriented Innovation Specialist in Patent Technology to join its growing team. This unique role sits at the exciting intersection of patent law, artificial intelligence, and software development. Reporting directly to the software development team leads, you will play a crucial role in shaping the AI-powered tools used by our patent professionals and clients. You’ll play a hands-on role in prompt engineering, tool testing, documentation, support, and customer onboarding, and you will be a key player in the transformation of patent practice through AI, enabling better client outcomes and defining best practices in a rapidly evolving field.

CAFC Affirms Dismissal for Lack of Standing in Software Patent Dispute

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) today issued a decision in Applications in Internet Time, LLC v. Salesforce, Inc., affirming a district court’s dismissal of AIT’s patent infringement suit against Salesforce for lack of constitutional standing. The court determined that the district court correctly concluded that Applications in Internet Time, LLC (AIT) had no exclusionary patent rights at the inception of the lawsuit. It also held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying equitable relief to cure the constitutional standing defect.

Netlist, Samsung Spar Over RPI Requirements for PTAB Trial Petitions in Requests for Director Review

Last week, consumer electronics giant Samsung filed responses to requests for Director Review by patent owner Netlist in validity proceedings instituted at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). Netlist is contending that the trials should be dismissed because Samsung failed to identify all real parties in interest (RPIs) in the PTAB petitions challenging Netlist patent claims directed to dynamic random access memory (the ‘087 patent) and memory modules for reduced noise in signal transmissions (the ‘731 patent).

NCLA Revives Newman Case Against Moore with Supreme Court Petition

The New Civil Liberties Alliance (NCLA) has filed a petition for a writ of certiorari asking the U.S. Supreme Court to review its case against U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) Chief Judge Kimberly Moore for what the NCLA dubs the “unlawful” removal of Newman from her duties on the court.

Other Barks & Bites for Friday, March 13: Former USPTO Patent Examiner Settles Conflict Allegations; EU Parliament Endorses EUIPO Register of Works Used to Train AI; U.S.-Based Operations Become Discretionary Denial Factor at PTAB

This week in Other Barks & Bites: the U.S. Department of Justice announces a six-figure settlement with a former U.S. Patent and Trademark Office patent examiner over conflict of interest allegations for the second time in two weeks; USPTO Director John Squires issues a memo establishing U.S.-based operations as a discretionary denial consideration for petitions at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; and more.

Chamber’s 2026 IP Index Sees Scores Decrease in Eight EU Member States

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s Global Innovation Policy Center (GIPC) today released its 2026 International IP Index, which flagged concerning trends about the “growing erosion of IP leadership” among the world’s high-performing economies, according to the report’s authors. In particular, the report noted that scores in eight EU Member States have declined this year, although the top ten rankings remained the same from 2025. The United States was again number one, with a relatively stable score of 95.15% compared with last year’s 95.17%.

Subscribe to IPWatchdog

This is the best way to stay informed. We send a daily roundup of our latest news, press releases, and events.

Get Email Updates