Inside the PTAB Reset: Practical Fixes for a Reengineered PTAB | IPWatchdog Unleashed

In this episode of IPWatchdog Unleashed, I speak with Matt Johnson, Co-Chair of the PTAB Practice at Jones Day, and we take an in-depth look at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) nearly a decade and a half after its launch. Johnson and I discuss the ongoing PTAB reset at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and suggest practical fixes for a better, reengineered PTAB. The majority of the conversation is devoted to concrete, targeted reform suggestions that would lead to a better functioning PTAB and more streamlined IPR review system. Instead of abstract complaints, Johnson proposes narrowing PGR estoppel to encourage early challenges, moving IPR estoppel to the point of institution to eliminate gamesmanship, separating institution decisions from full merits adjudication to reduce confirmation bias, and rethinking quiet-title concepts to better align notice to implementers with settled expectations of patent owners.

Federal Circuit Upholds PTAB Finding that Aerial Imaging Patents are Obvious

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) on Tuesday affirmed two final written decisions from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) in inter partes review (IPR) proceedings, concluding that the board did not err in finding claims of two Eagle View Technologies, Inc. patents unpatentable as obvious. Eagle View Technologies, Inc. had appealed the PTAB’s decisions, which held that claims of its U.S. Patent Nos. 8,670,961 and 8,078,436 were obvious over a combination of prior art references. The patents, both titled “Aerial Roof Estimation Systems and Methods,” share a common specification and relate to systems and methods that allow estimates involving roofs on buildings to be created remotely. The patents teach remotely generating a roof estimate report by analyzing multiple aerial images of a building to determine the area, shape, and slope of the roof.

Moore Dissent Says CAFC Created Design Patent Law Problem in Egyptian Goddess

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) on Monday issued a precedential decision affirming a district court’s grant of summary judgment of non-infringement to Armaid Company, Inc. that its massage product did not infringe Range of Motion Products LLC’s (RoM’s) design patent claims. The opinion was authored by Judge Cunningham and Chief Judge Moore delivered a dissent in which she claimed her court has caused “the legal frame of reference” in design patent law cases to become “askew.”

Congratulations to the 2024 and 2025 IPWatchdog Dog of the Year!

Although IPWatchdog has the word “Dog” in it’s name and logo, the publication is in no way associated with dogs.  However, Gene and I have a shared love of dogs and have SIX German shorthaired pointers (3 sets of male/female siblings) ranging in age from 11 months to 6 years old.  We love dogs so much that when we posted our first job post in 2020, one of the job “requirements” was “must love dogs” (Plural).  Today, the majority of our employees share this same love of dogs and most have dogs of their own.

EUIPO-EPO Joint Report Finds IP-Driven Industries Contribute Nearly Half of EU GDP, One-Third of Total Jobs

On Thursday, the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and the European Patent Office (EPO) issued a joint report on IP and innovation in various industrial sectors of the European economy. Identifying IP-driven industries by analyzing registrations for IP rights within the EU, the agencies conclude that such industries contribute nearly half of the entire European gross domestic product (GDP) while also providing a third of the EU’s jobs, which offer workers larger wages on average when compared to total EU employment.

PTAB Masters Panelists Predict Rough Road for Pending Patent Bills, Tough Questions from Congress on USPTO Rules, Warn of Widening Gap Between CAFC and USPTO

Panelists at IPWatchdog’s Virtual PTAB Masters Program 2026 last week had some cynical views on chances for pending patent reform bills, while on Friday other experts offered insights into developments at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) with respect to review of Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) cases. Speaking on Thursday’s panel, titled “Capitol Hill & PTAB Politics: Innovation Policy, Congressional Oversight and Mid-term Elections,” panelists first addressed the chances of bills such as the Patent Eligibility Restoration Act (PERA) and the Promoting and Respecting Economically Vital American Innovation Leadership (PREVAIL) Act advancing this year.

Other Barks & Bites for Friday, January 30: Senator Cantwell Criticizes Cuts to Federal R&D Funding; Kalyan Deshpande Named Chief Judge of PTAB

This week in Other Barks & Bites: the Federal Circuit denies yet another mandamus petition seeking relief from the settled expectations doctrine for discretionary IPR denials at the PTAB; Europe’s top IP agencies release a joint report showing that IP-driven industries contribute half of Europe’s GDP and account for one out of three jobs in the EU; a report by a coalition of creators organizations warns that generative AI threatens one out of every three jobs in the creative industries; Senator Maria Cantwell urges the Trump Administration to restore federal funding levels for the nation’s top science and research agencies; Apple announces record-breaking quarterly revenues on iPhone sales; Kalyan Deshpande moves from his interim role at the PTAB to a permanent Chief Judge position; and more.

Subscribe to IPWatchdog

This is the best way to stay informed. We send a daily roundup of our latest news, press releases, and events.

Get Email Updates