IPWatchdog’s New Publication Policy: No Paywall, But No Free Ride

“If you want to build a reputation as an authority and you want people to actually find and read your articles, you need to be publishing with IPWatchdog.com!”

publication policyIPWatchdog.com has been publishing online continuously since 1999. As a result, we enjoy excellent search engine ranking and placement, with articles immediately becoming indexed by the major search engines, including Google. We have always accepted guest contributions for publication, and while that is not changing, our publication rules and guidelines have recently changed. For full transparency, I wanted to explain what has changed and why.

Never Behind a Paywall

Unlike virtually every other publication in the industry, IPWatchdog has never published articles behind a paywall. And we diligently work to index all the articles we publish with LinkedIn, and we publish a free daily newsletter received by our most dedicated readers. Our approach to publishing and promoting articles—and the fact that they can be easily found and freely read by anyone and everyone—is why IPWatchdog.com is one of the largest intellectual property publications in the world, with nearly 1.1 million different, unique individuals visiting IPWatchdog.com in 2024 alone. Indeed, we know that in many respects IPWatchdog.com has become the publication of record for the industry, with many firms and individuals telling us they have canceled subscriptions to expensive news services because they view them as unnecessary.

Our plan is to continue to put our foot on the accelerator, and to publish the best news and most accurate analysis and to keep that free of charge from the readers’ perspective. And truthfully it is hard to imagine any circumstances where we would ever change this core belief. We are fundamentally opposed to publishing articles behind a paywall and charging readers because, overwhelmingly, people will not pay for content. Whether that is good or bad is irrelevant. Internet readers simply do not pay for content in numbers large enough to make charging readers to read a viable business model.

So, ruling out charging readers to read means that we must monetize IPWatchdog.com in other ways. And over the years we have increasingly moved to monetize through sponsored webinars, in-person programs, banner ads and podcast sponsorships.

Why the Change?

Increasingly, as more publications charge fees to publish, require assignment of the underlying copyright, and place content behind a paywall, we are receiving more (and numerous) requests to publish on our platform. And the increase has largely come from attorneys at large firms who never (or only rarely) financially support us. Ironically, the pitches we receive typically come from an outside PR firm who is being paid to get us to publish articles for free. So, it has been hard not to notice that these firms never support us financially, they do support others financially, and—instead of supporting us—they are paying PR people to get us to publish for free. Clearly, we are doing something wrong and need to course correct.

Who is Eligible to Publish on IPWatchdog.com

Moving forward, we will only allow law firms and service providers who financially support IPWatchdog to write for our platform. Specifically, we will only publish articles from those who have financially supported IPWatchdog in some way within the last 12 months. This financial support can be through some combination of sponsoring webinars, sponsoring in-person programs, buying banner ads and/or sponsoring our podcast. As a small business ourselves, we understand that it is unrealistic and inappropriate to have bright-line expectations that equally apply to big and small firms. We will not expect the same level of support from solo practitioners and small firms as we will require from larger firms.

Any articles submitted by law firms and service providers must still satisfy our other publication criteria, including being primarily non-commercial in nature. And this new policy does not apply to in-house attorneys, industry thought leaders, newsmakers, such as current and former government officials and judges, who are welcome to continue publishing on IPWatchdog.com.

Support IPWatchdog and Join the Community

In short, if you want to build a reputation as an authority and you want people to actually find and read your articles, you need to be publishing with IPWatchdog.com! After all, it takes the same amount of time to write an article that no one will find and read, so why not publish with IPWatchdog.com instead?

Support us and become a member of the IPWatchdog community. From a business development perspective, I assure you it will be the best decision you and your firm have ever made.

If you have interest in supporting IPWatchdog, please contact us using this form.

Image Source: Deposit Photos
Author: alexmillos
Image ID: 29893499 

Share

Warning & Disclaimer: The pages, articles and comments on IPWatchdog.com do not constitute legal advice, nor do they create any attorney-client relationship. The articles published express the personal opinion and views of the author as of the time of publication and should not be attributed to the author’s employer, clients or the sponsors of IPWatchdog.com.

Join the Discussion

19 comments so far.

  • [Avatar for Anon]
    Anon
    April 17, 2025 11:15 am

    To all of the IPWatchdog family: bravo, kudos and well wishes.

    I am not certain why anyone in the IP world would view ‘business’ as a dirty word, or attempt to take shots at Gene and company’s choices of running their business – as the pitch here is both well reasoned AND well articulated.

    It would be error to think that any business could thrive, let alone survive, just because their product “has value” but there being no way for that business to leverage that value. Certainly, plenty of business models exist (i.e., loss leaders, razor blades, heck, even pornography) that entice with ‘free,’ but none of these operate entirely as ‘all value is free.’ That Gene and company have set forth a path to both leverage and maintain a more open access deserves applause.

  • [Avatar for Raymond Van Dyke]
    Raymond Van Dyke
    April 16, 2025 03:06 pm

    Wrong forum Josh

  • [Avatar for Josh Malone]
    Josh Malone
    April 16, 2025 02:46 pm

    @Raymond, I’m open-minded about this, but I’m struggling to tie it to first principles. To me, if the machine summarizes or quotes the author with credit, then the principles are upheld. If the machine has amalgamated millions of sources but doesn’t plagerize any of them, what then? Why shouldn’t the same rules apply to the machine that apply to a human?

  • [Avatar for Renee C. Quinn]
    Renee C. Quinn
    April 16, 2025 12:20 pm

    Thank you @John Paul Archuletta, for your kind words.

  • [Avatar for John Paul Archuleta]
    John Paul Archuleta
    April 16, 2025 07:51 am

    Well Gene,and Renee, I commend you for everything you have done for with the newsletter . I have been able to read the best information possible on my passion for the life of intellectual property. I couldn’t even imagine on many hours that all ipwatchdog newsletter employees are numerous. With the global economy changing so fast and technology flying through the internet it becomes increasingly difficult for me to navigate the industry of scientific research and technologies emerging with many entities have taken advantage of many inventors and innovation techniques. Well I could say so much more about your devoted work. Transparency is key. Thank you so much for your time and help.

  • [Avatar for Bob Zeidman]
    Bob Zeidman
    April 16, 2025 02:47 am

    Gene, I asked a question about your new model, and you put words in my mouth (“IPWatchdog… has no value,” “worthless,” “gigantic mistake”). I’m not sure where this animosity is coming from. I wish you success with your new business model.

  • [Avatar for Gene Quinn]
    Gene Quinn
    April 15, 2025 06:06 pm

    Thanks for the comment @Ray.

  • [Avatar for Gene Quinn]
    Gene Quinn
    April 15, 2025 06:06 pm

    Thanks @Erich. It has been too long. I hope you are well.

  • [Avatar for Renee C. Quinn]
    Renee C. Quinn
    April 15, 2025 09:42 am

    Thank you @Erich.

  • [Avatar for Gene Quinn]
    Gene Quinn
    April 15, 2025 09:33 am

    @Bob…

    Your comment precisely demonstrates why we needed to change our policy. You (and others) think that what IPWatchdog does has no value. That is categorically wrong. And if you think what we provide has no value and the only value resides in the writing of the article you are no different than the inventor who wants 90% licensing revenues because the manufacturer and distributor would have had nothing without them. The truth is Eileen writes daily, I write at least several times a week. We hire freelance journalists with particularized knowledge of IP (unlike many other outlets), so we have opened our platform to guests– we do not need, require or monetize those guests.

    Eileen reviews and edits the articles, is that worthless?

    Why do you and others want to publish on IPWatchdog.com? Because we have spend 26 years building our platform and have a massive reach. Is that worthless?

    Are the computer resources required– including servers and people to constantly maintain IPWatchdog.com and thwart hackers and malicious actors worthless?

    And you make a gigantic mistake when you think we are monetizing articles. That is simply not true. We offer authors a megaphone to get their message out. If that is not appealing then you can go elsewhere.

  • [Avatar for Erich Spangenberg]
    Erich Spangenberg
    April 15, 2025 09:29 am

    I start most days reading IPW (since around 2005). I find IPW content to be timely and always about the right level of coverage for me. Elated that you are coming up with ways to continue providing this great service to the IP community. The PR firm thing is too funny …

  • [Avatar for Renee C. Quinn]
    Renee C. Quinn
    April 15, 2025 09:26 am

    Thank you @Raymond.

  • [Avatar for Eileen McDermott]
    Eileen McDermott
    April 15, 2025 09:22 am

    @BobZeidman: We’re not requiring payment to author articles. Decisions on which articles to publish are still entirely at my discretion as editor in chief, but we will be giving preference to those who support the business in some way when it comes to authoring guest articles, which benefit the author far more than us – articles have no monetary value for us whatsoever in their own right. Other publications charge authors thousands outright to publish, with few exceptions.

  • [Avatar for Bob Zeidman]
    Bob Zeidman
    April 15, 2025 05:40 am

    Gene, please correct me if I’m wrong. I create IP in the form of an article, and I must pay to have IP Watchdog publish it and monetize it. This model also applies to other individual inventors.

  • [Avatar for Raymond Van Dyke]
    Raymond Van Dyke
    April 15, 2025 05:17 am

    Amidst the extraordinary challenges to monetizing in an information is free universe, I have wondered about the IPW model, particularly the costs for this growing comprehensiveness.
    This approach is logical and fair.

  • [Avatar for Renee C. Quinn]
    Renee C. Quinn
    April 14, 2025 05:38 pm

    Thanks @Pro Say. And thanks @Josh. We appreciate it.

  • [Avatar for Gene Quinn]
    Gene Quinn
    April 14, 2025 05:20 pm

    Thanks @Josh. Thanks @Pro Say.

  • [Avatar for Josh Malone]
    Josh Malone
    April 14, 2025 05:09 pm

    IP Watchdog has published hundreds of articles by actual inventors, providing a broad perspective of how the U.S. patent system functions, in the context of “securing to inventors the exclusive right to their discoveries”. Now other platform has come close to providing this critical perspective to the industry.

  • [Avatar for Pro Say]
    Pro Say
    April 14, 2025 04:07 pm

    Given the great, unquestionable value that writing for / publishing on IPWatchdog brings to authors, law firms, service providers, and others operating in (and profiting from) the IP realm, this is certainly a fair and reasonable approach to insure that one of the leading sources of interesting, thought-provoking, useful, and indeed actionable (and profitable) content continues to remain economically viable for many years to come.

Varsity Sponsors

From IPWatchdog