NO FAKES Act Reintroduced to Support from Both Big Tech and Creators

“According to a press release by the Recording Industry Association of America today, the updated bill ‘takes a measured approach to protecting Americans from invasive deepfakes while reducing litigation and promoting American AI development.'”

NO FAKES ActToday, Senators Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), Chris Coons (D-DE), Thom Tillis (R-NC) and Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) reintroduced the NO FAKES Act, which would create a federal IP right to an individual’s voice and likeness.

In September 2024, U.S. Representatives María Elvira Salazar (R-FL), Madeleine Dean (D-PA), Nathaniel Moran (R-TX), Joe Morelle (D-NY), Rob Wittman (R-VA) and Adam Schiff (D-CA) introduced the bill in the House of Representatives, two months after Coons, Blackburn, Klobuchar and Tillis had in the Senate.

discussion draft of the bill was first introduced in October 2023 with the stated goal of “protect[ing] the voice and visual likenesses of individuals from unfair use through generative artificial intelligence (GAI).”

According to a press release by the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) today, the updated bill “takes a measured approach to protecting Americans from invasive deepfakes while reducing litigation and promoting American AI development – garnering notable support from both the creative community and the tech industry, including OpenAI, Google, Amazon and IBM.”

The bill includes a provision titled “No Duty to Monitor,” which provides that “except as expressly provided in subsection (d)(1)(B)(ii), nothing in this section may be construed to require the provider of an online service to—monitor the online service for, or affirmatively seek facts about, any digital replica; or gain access to material.”

Subsection (d)(1)(B)(ii) says that the provider of an online service, once properly notified,  must remove or disable “access to the work embodying the claimed unauthorized digital replica or the product or service specifically identified in a notice sent under that paragraph, or, as applicable, the link or reference to the unauthorized digital replica or product or service, as soon as is technically and practically feasible for that provider.”

YouTube is also now supporting the bill, and the company’s VP of Public Policy, Leslie Miller, said in a statement today that it “is consistent with our ongoing efforts to protect creators and viewers, and reflects our commitment to shaping a future where AI is used responsibly.”

Congress has been interested in finding ways to curb abuse of AI to create unauthorized digital replicas of individuals and their works for some time. The Senate Subcommittee on Intellectual Property heard from six witnesses in April 2024 to get their thoughts on the discussion draft of the NO FAKES Act and they urged the lawmakers to strike a careful balance between treading on First Amendment rights and allowing artists more control over their likeness. When the Senate bill was introduced, organizations including OpenAI, The Walt Disney Company, Warner Music Group, the Authors Guild, the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), the Motion Picture Association (MPA), Universal Music Group and SAG-AFTRA came out in support.

The Human Artistry Campaign last year also released poll figures showing that U.S. voters are “deeply concerned about the impact of AI on society.” According to the poll results, which were based on a survey conducted between July 25 and 29, 2024, among 808 Registered Voters Nationwide, 85% of those surveyed believed “we need new guardrails to protect people from being exploited by AI.”

As part of GRAMMYs on the Hill Advocacy Day in Washington DC, which ended with the introduction of the NO FAKES Act, Harvey Mason jr., CEO of the Recording Academy, said “as we enter a new era of technology, we must create guardrails around AI and ensure it enhances – not replaces – human creativity.”

This article was updated on 4/11/2025 to delete Adobe from the list of supporters of the bill named in the RIAA press release. The RIAA release named Adobe in error.

Image Source: Deposit Photos
Author: phonlamai
Image ID: 207012486 

 

Share

Warning & Disclaimer: The pages, articles and comments on IPWatchdog.com do not constitute legal advice, nor do they create any attorney-client relationship. The articles published express the personal opinion and views of the author as of the time of publication and should not be attributed to the author’s employer, clients or the sponsors of IPWatchdog.com.

Join the Discussion

One comment so far.

  • [Avatar for Pro Say]
    Pro Say
    April 11, 2025 03:31 pm

    “which would create a federal IP right to an individual’s voice and likeness.”

    Oh, you mean like the federal patent IP right to an individual’s invention . . . which USED to exist . . . before SCOTUS and the CAFC went full-bore amok? (while you sat by quietly watching it happen)

    Congress: Why is protecting folks’ voice and likeness more important than protecting their America-strengthening, Communist China-insulating innovations?

    Why?

Varsity Sponsors

IPWatchdog Events

Virtual Artificial Intelligence Masters™ 2026
May 18 @ 8:00 am - May 19 @ 5:00 pm EDT
Webinar: Sponsored by Ankar
May 26 @ 12:00 pm - 1:00 pm EDT
Webinar: Sponsored by Juristat
May 28 @ 12:00 pm - 1:00 pm EDT
Patent Masters™ 2026 – Portfolios, Licensing and Enforcement
June 8 @ 8:00 am - June 10 @ 5:00 pm EDT

Industry Events

PIUG 2026 Joint Annual and Biotechnology Conference
May 19 @ 8:00 am - May 21 @ 5:00 pm EDT
Certified Patent Valuation Analyst Training
May 28 @ 9:00 am - May 29 @ 5:00 pm EDT
2026 WIPO-U.S. Summer School on Intellectual Property
June 1 @ 9:00 am - June 12 @ 1:45 pm EDT

From IPWatchdog