USPTO Solves U.S. Patent Eligibility Problems

“With the launch of this new tool, the U.S. patent system’s well-documented problems with eligibility since Alice v. CLS Bank will be largely solved.”

eligibilityThe U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) announced today that it is deploying an artificial intelligence (AI) tool that will finally solve the problem of patent eligibility analysis for examiners.

The AI system is called “McConaughey Agentic Tasking Technology Helping Examiner Workload,” or “MATTHEW,” for short. It is the latest tool launched for use in the examination process, following the  Artificial Intelligence Search Automated Pilot Program, or “ASAP!,” for patent prior art references followed and the Trademark Classification Agentic Codification Tool, or “Class ACT,” for trademark searching.

According to the press release, MATTHEW will “help examiners tackle the thorniest of eligibility questions as to whether claims presented are an abstract idea or a patent-eligible invention.”

With the launch of this new tool, the U.S. patent system’s well-documented problems with eligibility since Alice v. CLS Bank will be largely solved. With an AI system evaluating eligibility, courts will be unable to invalidate claims that have been granted using MATTHEW’s fool-proof algorithm.

Squires has also suspended all precedent on eligibility, including Desjardins, Alice, and Mayo. “Basically, in terms of eligibility, if MATTHEW says your invention is ‘Alright, Alright, Alright,’ then it’s ‘Alright, Alright, Alright’ with the USPTO,” he remarked.

In response to the USPTO’s announcement, a U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit judge, who spoke on condition of anonymity to safeguard their anti-patent street credibility, on Wednesday indicated that they pledge to uphold all eligibility determinations made using MATTHEW.

“We have had no idea how to determine Section 101 eligibility for the last decade plus, so we welcome this solution and look forward to affirming all USPTO analyses going forward,” said the judge. “In fact, don’t bother appealing on eligibility grounds anymore—what MATTHEW says, goes,” they added.

For more information on the USPTO’s groundbreaking new AI system, please visit the USPTO website, and:

HAPPY APRIL FOOL’S DAY!

Share

Warning & Disclaimer: The pages, articles and comments on IPWatchdog.com do not constitute legal advice, nor do they create any attorney-client relationship. The articles published express the personal opinion and views of the author as of the time of publication and should not be attributed to the author’s employer, clients or the sponsors of IPWatchdog.com.

Join the Discussion

2 comments so far. Add my comment.

  • [Avatar for Pro Say]
    Pro Say
    April 1, 2026 06:53 pm

    . . . while in other news, SCOTUS today admitted that they unconstitutionally usurped Congressional authority when they limited what is eligible for patenting . . . while Congress revoked the AIA as a grand experiment gone very, very bad for American innovation.

    Huzzah! America is back!

  • [Avatar for Daniel Hanson]
    Daniel Hanson
    April 1, 2026 04:47 pm

    Who doesn’t like a good April Fool’s patent-related story? Here’s one from six years ago on IPWatchdog:

    https://ipwatchdog.com/2020/04/01/focusing-on-the-details-two-recent-uspto-matters-teach-us-patentability/

Add Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Varsity Sponsors

IPWatchdog Events

IPWatchdog Webinar
May 7 @ 12:00 pm - 1:00 pm EDT
Webinar: Sponsored by Clearstone IP
May 14 @ 12:00 pm - 1:00 pm EDT
Virtual Artificial Intelligence Masters™ 2026
May 18 @ 8:00 am - May 19 @ 5:00 pm EDT

Industry Events

PIUG 2026 Joint Annual and Biotechnology Conference
May 19 @ 8:00 am - May 21 @ 5:00 pm EDT
Certified Patent Valuation Analyst Training
May 28 @ 9:00 am - May 29 @ 5:00 pm EDT
2026 WIPO-U.S. Summer School on Intellectual Property
June 1 @ 9:00 am - June 12 @ 1:45 pm EDT

From IPWatchdog