AI has moved from experimentation to become a critical tool that many practitioners are integrating into modern patent practice. This means the differentiator is no longer access to tools alone – it’s the ability to control them to provide the desired outputs. And obtaining the best results comes down to prompt design.

This conversation on Tuesday, April 7, at 12 PM ET, will move past generic “prompt tips” and get into operational reality. Panelists will break down how sophisticated users are structuring prompts to generate prosecution-ready drafts, refine claim language, analyze prior art, and streamline portfolio workflows – without sacrificing quality or intruding on professional judgment.

If you’re not getting consistent, high-value output from AI, the problem is not the tool – the problem is how the tool is being used. This session will provide you with actionable solutions for getting the precise output you want and need – immediately and at scale.

We will focus on repeatability and reliability. Panelists will deconstruct real examples – what worked, what failed, and why – and show how small changes in prompt structure materially impact output quality, speed, and risk profile. The discussion will also address where prompting ends and human expertise must take over, particularly in high-stakes drafting and prosecution decisions.

Who This Benefits:

• Patent practitioners seeking leverage in drafting and office action response workflows.
• In-house IP counsel driving efficiency while maintaining quality control across outside counsel.
• IP operations and legal ops professionals building scalable, AI-enabled processes.
• Innovation and IP strategy leaders focused on ROI, integration, and competitive advantage in AI adoption.