Netlist Continues Enforcement Campaign Against Samsung DRAM Modules at ITC

“[A]fter Samsung repeatedly failed its obligations to fulfill Netlist orders of memory products at competitive prices, Netlist terminated the [joint development agreement].”

NetlistThis Monday, Irvine, CA-based memory technology developer Netlist filed a complaint with the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) alleging rampant infringement of its patent rights by dynamic random access memory (DRAM) devices manufactured by Samsung, including those used in Google products. The complaint is Netlist’s latest action against Samsung following a breached joint development agreement and two jury verdicts entered in U.S. district court awarding Netlist more than $420 million for Samsung’s infringing memory modules.

Section 337 Complaint Follows Jury Verdicts of Willful Infringement, Breached Agreement

Since its founding in 2000, Netlist has developed and commercialized several DRAM and NAND memory innovations, including load reduction and power management advances, that have led its distributed buffer architecture to be widely adopted as the industry’s predominant high-end server memory module. In April 2021, Netlist entered into an agreement with South Korean chipmaker SK hynix settling pending litigation between the parties and granting SK hynix a worldwide, non-exclusive license to its portfolio of memory technologies.

Netlist and Samsung entered into a joint development and license agreement (JDLA) in November 2015 with the goal of creating a standard interface for non-volatile dual in-line memory module (NVDIMM) products to facilitate broad industry adoption. However, after Samsung repeatedly failed its obligations to fulfill Netlist orders of memory products at competitive prices, Netlist terminated the JDLA in July 2020. Netlist also filed suit against Samsung in the Central District of California leading to a jury verdict entered this March finding that Samsung materially breached the JDLA.

In the Eastern District of Texas, Netlist filed a pair of patent infringement lawsuits against Samsung leading to jury findings of infringement in both cases. In April 2023, Netlist was awarded $303.15 million in damages for Samsung’s infringement of five patents, and in November 2024, a second verdict handed Netlist $118 million for three infringed patents. Netlist has also filed patent infringement suits in Northern California district court against Google, a former customer of Netlist’s that began purchasing Samsung modules after sourcing Netlist module designs customized for Google from other manufacturers.

Netlist’s USITC complaint alleges violations of 19 U.S.C. § 1337 (Section 337) committed by Samsung, Google and Super Micro, which also sells server and storage systems incorporating Samsung memory modules, through infringement of six patents:

  • U.S. Patent No. 10025731 and U.S. Patent No. 12373366, related to power-management and signal-correction features in Samsung’s fifth-generation DIMM products enabling increased energy efficiency and reliable signals at high data rates.
  • U.S. Patent No. 9824035, U.S. Patent 10217523 and U.S. Patent No. 10268608, related to buffer circuits incorporated into memory modules to electrically isolate memory devices such that additional devices may be added to modules without sacrificing signal integrity or speed.
  • U.S. Patent No. 12308087, which claims an arrangement of stacked dies and interconnects for memory architectures that enables high-bandwidth memory operations while mitigating load issues, maintaining optimal performance in servers handling large amounts of data.

$3.87 Billion Chip Packaging Plant in Indiana Cited for Domestic Industry Requirement

The Section 337 complaint lists a series of Samsung fifth-generation DIMMs as accused products. In addition, Netlist’s allegations also target Google’s custom-designed Tensor Processing Unit (TPU), Google Cloud Platform virtual machine services, and Super Micro’s graphics processing unit (GPU)-optimized servers, each of which incorporate high-bandwidth memory features.

Netlist identifies significant investments since 2021 spent both by itself and licensee SK hynix to satisfy the economic prong of Section 337’s domestic industry requirement. In particular, SK hynix’s $3.87 billion investment into building chip packaging facilities in West Lafayette, IN, announced in April 2024, is expected to support 1,000 jobs in high bandwidth memory production and advanced packaging when it begins operations in 2028. This construction project is being supported by up to $958 million in direct funding and loans available under the CHIPS and Science Act. For its part, Netlist has also invested tens of millions of dollars since 2021 in developing memory modules within the U.S. and bringing them to market domestically.

Relief requested by Netlist include issuance of a limited exclusion order (LEO) forbidding the entry of infringing DRAM devices and products including them into the U.S. for sale, as well as permanent cease-and-desist orders prohibiting respondents from importing or selling the accused DRAM products.

Image Source: Deposit Photos
Author: billperry
ID 18479953

Share

Warning & Disclaimer: The pages, articles and comments on IPWatchdog.com do not constitute legal advice, nor do they create any attorney-client relationship. The articles published express the personal opinion and views of the author as of the time of publication and should not be attributed to the author’s employer, clients or the sponsors of IPWatchdog.com.

Join the Discussion

3 comments so far. Add my comment.

  • [Avatar for Frank Yahoo]
    Frank Yahoo
    November 26, 2025 10:57 am

    Highly interesting note and development in this case: the US PTO and US Department of Justice have submitted their joint comments to the ITC’s solicitation of Comments Relating to the Public Interest of the Netlist 337 case. They urge the ITC to first evaluate violation (patent infringment and imports infringing Netlist patents) and only then consider public interest. And if violation is shown, exclusion order (import bans) on Samsungs DRAM and HBM should apply as well as on Google’s and Super Micro server memory. All can be found here:
    https://edis.usitc.gov/external/search/basic.html?keywords=337-3854

  • [Avatar for Frank Yahoo]
    Frank Yahoo
    November 26, 2025 04:25 am

    On Monday, 24 Nov, former ITC Vice-Chairman Ronald Cass, former CAFC Chief Judge Paul Michel and other Professors of Law of the Richmond University, submitted their comments to the ITC in response to the ITC’s solicitation of Comments Relating to the Public Interest of the Netlist 337 case filed to the ITC requesting exclusion order various memory (including DDR5 and HBM) imported by Samsung, Google and Super Micro. Very educational and interesting !

    https://edis.usitc.gov/external/search/basic.html?keywords=337-3854

  • [Avatar for Wolfgang Gelbmann]
    Wolfgang Gelbmann
    November 25, 2025 07:44 pm

    If you continue monitoring that case:

    – ITC on 17 Nov has issued a Solicitation of Comments Relating to the Public Interest, which they rarely do pre-institution.

    – this has triggered yesterday an amicus brief and also a brief in support of Netlist and an exclusion order if infringement is found, signed by former ITC Vice-chairman and Commissioner Ronald A. Cass, former CAFC Chief Judge Paul Michel and other judges and lawyers.

Add Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Varsity Sponsors

IPWatchdog Events

Webinar: Sponsored by ClearstoneIP
January 27, 2026 @ 12:00 pm - 1:00 pm EST
PTAB Masters™ 2026
January 29, 2026 @ 8:00 am - January 30, 2026 @ 5:00 pm EST
IPWatchdog LIVE 2026 at the Renaissance Arlington Capital View
March 22, 2026 @ 1:00 pm - March 24, 2026 @ 7:00 pm EDT
Artificial Intelligence Masters™ 2026
May 18, 2026 @ 8:00 am - May 19, 2026 @ 5:00 pm EDT

From IPWatchdog