$80 Trillion and Growing: Lisa Jorgenson on Why IP Matters | IPWatchdog Unleashed

“[G]lobal intangibles are valued at over $80 trillion, more than the world’s five largest economies combined, and a 13-fold increase since 1996.” — Lisa Jorgenson

Last week on IPWatchdog Unleashed our conversation was with Judge John Holcomb of the United States Federal District Court for the Central District of California. Judge Holcomb was our keynote speaker on Tuesday, March 4 at IPWatchdog LIVE 2025. This week on IPWatchdog Unleashed we present another keynote speaker—Lisa Jorgenson. Jorgenson’s speech was given during lunch on Monday, March 3. You can listen to her entire speech by downloading the podcast here.

Lisa Jorgenson is Deputy Director General for Patents and Technology at the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). And even before assuming the position as Deputy Director General of WIPO in 2021, she was very well known to the U.S. intellectual property community. Before moving to Geneva to join WIPO she was the Executive Director of the American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA). And prior to the AIPLA she was Vice President of Intellectual Property and Licensing at STMicroelectronics. Jorgenson is a friend to everyone in the IP community, and we were honored to have her speak at IPWatchdog LIVE.

Lisa Jorgenson: $80 Trillion and Growing: Why IP Matters More Than Ever“We’re meeting here at a critical moment,” Jorgenson began her speech saying. “Across industries, innovators and creators and those who support them are navigating rapid and profound change. From technology to trade, geopolitics to global economics, the international landscape is more complex and unpredictable than at any time in recent memory.”

The keynote by Jorgenson focused primarily on two questions. First, what are the key trends driving global innovation today? Second, what do those key trends mean for the IP community and the innovators and creators? But before diving into those questions, she provided a report on progress being made relative to harmonization of IP laws and standards.

“For the first time, WIPO successfully concluded not one but two major international agreements in a single year,” Jorgenson told the IPWatchdog audience. “These landmark achievements, the Riyadh Design Law Treaty and the WIPO Treaty on IP Genetic Resources and Associated Traditional Knowledge are significant for many reasons.” Jorgenson highlighted how the design treaty “reflects both the growing importance of design in innovation cycles and the enduring influence of the US IP leadership.” She explained these treaties “demonstrate a strong and growing appetite for clear and reliable IP frameworks and rules. This is a really an important point, especially as we think about the future of innovation, creativity and IP.”

Jorgenson also came armed with eye-popping facts and figures.

  • “[G]lobal intangibles are valued at over $80 trillion, more than the world’s five largest economies combined, and a 13-fold increase since 1996. In the US, 90% of the S&P market value is in intangible assets.”
  • “Global IP filings have nearly doubled over the past decade, growing from just under 11 million in 2013 to 20 million in 2023. That means that for every minute, around 40 IP applications are filed somewhere in the world.”
  • “[P]atent filings to the USPTO increased by around 5% over the last decade, with trademarks and designs rising by 66%. Patents, trademarks and designs filed by US innovators worldwide also increased by 6%, 35% and 45% respectively.”
  • “While it took 26 years to reach 1 million PCT applications, the jump from four to 5 million came in just four years.”
  • “The soaring value of the world’s leading brands now worth over $13 trillion, with 45% of the value here in the United States.” Cross-border payments for the use of IP are now worth $1 trillion annually, with the US earning two and a half times what any other country makes from selling IP abroad. And this shift is only accelerating.”
  • “[I]ntangible investment reached almost $7 trillion in 2023. The US is responsible for almost two-thirds of this total.”

Jorgenson also discussed how over the last 18 months WIPO has worked with 53 member states to strengthen patent examination. She also said over the past year WIPO has worked with 12 member states to provide legislative assistance for new IP enforcement provisions.

“I’ve yet to meet a policymaker or government official from any country who is not serious about leveraging digital services, clean tech, or creativity for their future growth,” Jorgenson said as she explained that this means the U.S. can expect continued global competition from emerging markets keen to strengthen their intellectual property systems. And while many understand that IP is a “strategic imperative”, “IP is still more mysterious and misunderstood than it should be.” And according to a WIPO survey, only 56% of respondents in the West believe IP beneficial to their economies, “while 76% of respondents in Asia Pacific and 70% in Africa viewed IP as beneficial to their economies,” Jorgenson explained.

“IP is seen less positively in the U.S. than in much of the developing world,” Jorgenson said. “Think of this as an $8 trillion question because that’s how much IP-intensive industries contribute to the U.S. economy every year, supporting tens of millions of jobs in the process. Yet a sizable gap remains between IP’s economic impact and its public perception.”

“An astonishing 12 million Americans now call themselves full-time content creators,” Jorgenson said. “Most of us have IP groundings in patents or other forms of industrial property, and while these will continue to dominate practice, we can’t afford to overlook areas like copyright, content, data, and software, which are growing in influence. Consider Japan. When we think of its economy, we tend to focus on robotics, consumer electronics, or other advanced technologies. But what’s surprising is that creative content, manga, anime, and others, now generates nearly as much overseas revenue as the semiconductor industry, around five trillion yen per year. The lesson is clear. Today’s innovation game is being played on more and more fronts, not just from an industrial context.”

To listen to the entire keynote speech given by Lisa Jorgenson, please visit IPWatchdog Unleashed on Buzzsprout, or download the podcast from wherever you listen to podcasts.

More IPWatchdog Unleashed

For more IPWatchdog Unleashed, see below for our growing archive of previous episodes.

Share

Warning & Disclaimer: The pages, articles and comments on IPWatchdog.com do not constitute legal advice, nor do they create any attorney-client relationship. The articles published express the personal opinion and views of the author as of the time of publication and should not be attributed to the author’s employer, clients or the sponsors of IPWatchdog.com.

Join the Discussion

3 comments so far.

  • [Avatar for Brad Baker]
    Brad Baker
    May 24, 2025 05:57 am

    Correct but it’s far worse than you can image. It’s a Cabal,so when they have the ability to manipulate data without any accountability facilitated by the USPTO Practitioners and Examiners we have no protection. The actual people we need protection from are from within. I spent 5 years investigating and all I can say is being an inventor in the US is a really bad idea. It’s a dark industry that cares nothing about the inventor only feeding the Cabal.

  • [Avatar for George]
    George
    May 2, 2025 05:02 pm

    How many Americans know a ‘successful’ inventor today, rather than maybe a ‘broke’ inventor (if any)? That explains this.

    Americans like success stories, not failure stories. They always have and who likes failure stories anyway?

    How many issued patents today result in financial success for inventors? I don’t know any. So why do people keep believing that patents still have any value? I haven’t for 20 years. Too easy to get around them and have the PTAB agree with doing that. Maybe AI can solve that problem (and reduce the number of examiners by 95% too).

  • [Avatar for George]
    George
    May 2, 2025 04:55 pm

    So why is the USPTO ‘intentionally’ and ‘secretly’ denying any and all ‘broad’ claims and patents now, especially if they could give small entities the power to assert them against some of the biggest companies in the world?!

    Why hasn’t this been exposed yet and why doesn’t Congress seem to care about this (or just doesn’t know about it)? Why haven’t attorneys pointed this out and SUED the USPTO over it yet?

    This was even going on prior to the (corrupt and corporate paid) AIA. Actually started with the ‘super-secret’ SAWS program in 1995 that the PTO didn’t want anyone learning about, not even attorneys, or Congress. Wasn’t that an unconstitutional ‘fraud’ by the PTO and who at the PTO authorized it? Didn’t it deny at least some ‘broad’ and potentially ‘very valuable’ new technologies their well-deserved IP?

    How much could all those ‘broad’, ‘valid’, valuable but intentionally BLOCKED (or sabotaged) patents have been worth over the last 30 years? How many women inventors, in particular, were cheated and defrauded by these secret policies over that time? How many were able to make any money off their inventions? How many lawsuits did they win against big companies? How many lawyers even want to take cases on contingency anymore? Why would they?

    We now have clear evidence (gathered over 15 years) that the PTO will go to any lengths necessary (including ‘unlimited searches’ and ‘unlimited new grounds’ for objections) to deny inventors ‘broad patents’ that could be very valuable or even ‘breakthroughs’, since they could threaten big corporations and monopolies. Image Apple having to pay huge royalties for a new technology that could make it billions?

    Imagine ANY company being willing to pay substantial royalties for ANY innovation now? They’d rather spend millions defeating such patents now. Still much cheaper.

    As a consequence, America’s inventors are getting ripped off more than at any time in history! Imagine Bell trying to get paid for his telephone ‘idea’ and SINGLE patent, today, not to mention the most valuable patent in history! He’d need at least 100 ‘narrow’ patents now and even that might not be enough (since he wouldn’t be able to get them fast enough or couldn’t afford to get 100 of them)!

    We have to finally face the fact that our patent system, especially its ‘European version’ under the AIA, is now just a joke that offers NO real protections to inventors and obviously doesn’t even ‘attempt’ to defend their own, supposedly legal, documents and won’t even back up their validity. This was never the case before the AIA! Indeed the PTAB now HELPS to ‘attack’ the validity of a huge number of the PTO’s own patents!

    And obviously, the USPTO has never helped inventors ‘assert’ & prosecute their patents against infringers. So what good are patents if they can’t be (affordably) enforced and the U.S. government doesn’t even offer low-cost ‘infringement insurance’ (which they should). It has become nothing more than a ‘racket’ and a ‘scam’ now, cheating inventors out of many well-deserved and in some cases very broad patents (like Crispr). A system that now only enriches infringers and lawyers. That’s easily proven too now! How many rich independent inventors do you know? The last one I heard of was Dean Kamen and I don’t think he’s doing all that well anymore. lol

Varsity Sponsors

IPWatchdog Events

CLE Webinar: Sponsored by Junior
August 20 @ 12:00 pm - 1:00 pm EDT
Women’s IP Forum 2026
September 23 @ 8:00 am - September 25 @ 5:00 pm EDT
Life Sciences Masters™ 2026
November 9 @ 8:00 am - November 11 @ 5:00 pm EST

From IPWatchdog