Mark A. Tidwell is a partner in the Intellectual Property Practice Group in the Houston office of Haynes Boone. He focuses his practice on prosecution, acquisition, licensing, divestiture and enforcement of patent rights, trademark rights, trade secrets and copyrights. Mark has filed and prosecuted hundreds of patent, trademark and copyright applications. He was honored in Intellectual Asset Magazine’s (IAM) Patent 1000: The World’s Leading Patent Practitioners, Globe White Page Ltd, 2014, 2016-2024 for patent prosecution and IP transaction work. Mark guest lectures at the Texas A&M Mays School of Business on Intellectual Property.
U.S. courts have long established that the owner of a product protected by a U.S. patent has the right to repair the product under the patent exhaustion doctrine (a.k.a. first-sale doctrine), under which the right to repair is generally interpreted to be a very broad right under U.S. patent law. A purchaser of the patented product may face some restrictions (e.g., preventing reconstruction of the item that goes well beyond simple wear-and-tear repairs), but overall courts have determined most modifications fall under the category of repair. This right to repair includes the right to select who repairs the product. But what happens when the product is purchased under a contract that includes a limitation on the right to repair, such as requiring the purchaser to use only the patent owner for repairs or prohibiting repair altogether?