Stephen T. Schreiner Image

Stephen T. Schreiner

Partner

Carmichael IP

Stephen T. Schreiner is a partner in Carmichael IP. He focuses on all aspects of intellectual property law, including: patent litigation, Inter Partes Reviews and other post-grant proceedings, patent portfolio development, counseling and IP due diligence.  Steve has experience in patents in the technology space, including: networks, network security, cryptography, software, digital television, signal processing, interactive media, the Internet and other areas. Steve also has experience in the FinTech space for the delivery of financial services and products.

Before joining Carmichael IP, Steve was a partner in an AmLaw 50 firm for many years.

Before becoming a lawyer, Steve spent eight years working as an engineer for the Department of Navy developing and testing digital signal processing algorithms processing underwater sound signals to detect enemy submarines. He has been recognized as one of the world’s leading IP and patent practitioners by Intellectual Asset Management and The Legal 500. Steve is a frequently published author on developments in patent law including patent eligibility and other topics.

Recent Articles by Stephen T. Schreiner

Winning Strategies at the PTAB, Part II: Common Pitfalls That Patent Owners Should Avoid

Part I of this article discussed how the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) is a very different tribunal from district courts. It is a venue where fact and issues of law are decided by technical specialists, who are also highly trained in patent law, instead of lay judges and juries. It also discussed the formidable challenge presented to patent owners by the PTAB, where inter partes review (IPR) institution rates are about 67% and final written decisions find all challenged claims unpatentable up to 70% of the time. Part II will discuss strategies that give patent owners a better chance at successfully navigating the IPR process.

Winning Strategies at the PTAB, Part I: Bring Your Game

Litigating the validity of claims in an inter partes review (IPR) at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) is vastly different from litigating validity in district court. PTAB judges are scientists and engineers, and they are also patent attorneys. They have significant technical training, and most have advanced technical degrees. You can assume they know substantive patent law cold. PTAB judges represent a very different audience from a lay judge or a jury in district court.

Past Events with Stephen T. Schreiner