Matthew Cutler is a Principal at Harness IP. Matt’s practice is focused on intellectual property litigation (both in the district courts and at the ITC), Inter Partes Review and Post-Grant Review proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. With more than 25 years of litigation experience, Matt has seen what has gone right for holders of intellectual property rights, as well as what can go wrong. His litigation expertise has allowed him to become a trusted advisor and problem solver on IP portfolio management issues. He delivers practical, battle-tested advice to more effectively manage the IP portfolios of companies both large and small.
Matt has argued and won claims before the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri and district courts around the country. One of two patent attorneys on the committee to draft the Local Patent Rules for the Eastern District of Missouri, which were adopted in 2011, Matt is frequently retained to serve as local counsel in the district.
Intellectual property owners frequently face difficulties getting their work removed from websites run by companies like Google and Apple, and other service providers where users upload infringing material. The service providers may provide forms and contact information for an intellectual property rights owner to contact when infringing material is found on their site. But, even strict adherence to the service provider’s procedures often fails to result in the removal of the infringing material. This leaves IP owners frustrated by a seeming inability to remove infringing content from the Internet.
Disappointing some (i.e., Patent Owners) who were looking for a more significant changes to the rules governing inter partes review, post grant review, and/or covered business method review, on April 1, 2016, the Patent Office issued its Amendments to the Rules of Practice for Trials Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. About one year earlier, the Office hinted at the possibility of more sweeping proposals for change, but many of the more major proposals were not implemented and only more incremental change was adopted. Here are the five things every Patent Owner and Petitioner must know about the new ground rules governing the most seismic change in patent law in several generations – post grant administrative trials.