Bruce Berman is Chairman and co-founder of the Center for Intellectual Property Understanding, a nonprofit organization established in 2016 that raises awareness about the impact of IP on people, business and society. CIPU provides outreach to improve IP awareness and promote sharing. It holds events, such as the annual IP Awareness SummitÒ and curates IdeasMatter.com and IPBasics.org, information portals. Bruce produces and hosts for CIPU ‘Understanding IP Matters,’ a top ranked podcast series that has generated more than 15,000 downloads. UIPM provides a platform for leading innovators, experts and business executives. CIPU has more than 25 partners and affiliates.
Bruce is Managing Director of Brody Berman Associates, a management consulting and communications firm that works with innovative businesses of all sizes and investors. Since 1988, Brody Berman has supported 200+ businesses and creators and has provided more than 60 law firms and their clients with litigation and transaction support.
Bruce is responsible for five books about the business of IP, including From Ideas to Assets. His Intangible Investor column, a regular feature on IPWatchdog, appeared in every issue of IAM magazine from 2003 to 2019. IP CloseUp, a weekly update on trends that he publishes, has generated more than 450,000 views and is read in over 70 countries. He has been named to the IAM Strategy 300: The World’s Leading Strategists every year since 2009. Bruce has mentored entrepreneurs and students in Kenya, Uganda and Colorado. He holds a master’s degree in cinema studies from Columbia University, where he taught for four years in the graduate program and completed curriculum and comprehensive requirements for the Ph.D.
Sharing information about an invention is not an option. With patents, disclosure is a requirement which benefits the inventor, other inventors and society. When and how an invention is shared makes a huge difference. Disclosing information and sharing the right to practice it are not the same. The Patent Bay, a new patent platform from a Swedish company that believes some patent owners are hoarders, is looking to change how patents are shared and used.
Sinners looks to be little more than a gothic horror movie set in the John Brown South with incredible box office appeal. Its storyline, however, reflects a subtler narrative about ownership and the bold agreement involving intellectual property rights that the film’s celebrated writer-director, Ryan Coogler, was able to secure from Warner Bros, which has some studio executives running for their wooden stakes.
An important new book about the impaired U.S. intellectual property (IP) system, The Big Steal – Ideology, Interest, and the Undoing of Intellectual Property, by Jonathan M. Barnett, reveals the deepening failure of IP rights to retain their property status and the weaknesses – seen and unseen – that have accompanied it. The focus of The Big Steal is on what the IP system’s recent failures impact, who they benefit, and what can be done to repair the damage.
Jockeying for position among the leading generative AI large language models (LLMs) has amplified their differences. Training models and code access are the source of some of the biggest disagreements. Should code for generative and other forms of AI be open or proprietary, protected under copyright, trade secret or even patent? There is a lot riding financially on the outcome, and there are good arguments for and against.
Few, if any, artists own the master recordings to their early albums. Not the Beatles, not Dylan, not Springsteen. Taylor Swift is no different. Labels gamble on acts and part of the upside if they hit—the quid pro quo, if you will—is owning valuable master recordings. Without control of these potential assets, they would likely walk away from most deals.