Webinar: Paying for Speed at the USPTO – Is Track One Worth the Investment?

Track One promises faster prosecution – but is it still a smart investment?

With rising USPTO backlogs, interest in prioritized examination is growing again. But many questions remain. Does Track One actually improve outcomes? Is it worth the large upfront price tag?

On Tuesday, June 24, at 12 PM ET, join Juristat’s Senior Vice President of IP Solutions, Francesca Cruz, and IPWatchdog’s Gene Quinn for a candid, data-driven discussion about the real ROI of the Track One program. Backed by advanced analytics from Juristat, we will dispel some common myths and explore:

• Whether Track One applications really earn higher allowance rates
• How the examiner’s experience and behavior compare to standard cases
• What rejection types are most common in Track One
• Whether Track One applications actually see fewer office actions and RCEs
• If the accelerated timeframe offsets the expense

Plus, hear from experienced practitioners Matthew Avery, Partner at Baker Botts, and Suvashis Bhattacharya, Chief IP Counsel at IQVIA, on their experiences with Track One. They will share insights from the front lines – what has worked, what has not, and what they would do differently.

If your team is weighing Track One in your filing strategy, this session will help you make informed, cost-conscious decisions based on facts and strong subject matter expertise.