{"id":123697,"date":"2020-08-03T07:15:33","date_gmt":"2020-08-03T11:15:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ipwatchdog.com\/?p=123697"},"modified":"2020-08-03T10:13:53","modified_gmt":"2020-08-03T14:13:53","slug":"look-inside-patent-processes-uspto-effects-pandemic-upcoming-changes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ipwatchdog.com\/2020\/08\/03\/look-inside-patent-processes-uspto-effects-pandemic-upcoming-changes\/id=123697\/","title":{"rendered":"A Look Inside Patent Processes at the USPTO: Effects of the Pandemic and Upcoming Changes"},"content":{"rendered":"

\u201cThe new system will allow applications to be coded according to multiple disciplines, rather than just one, and will allow more flexibility to find examiners with the specific expertise in the technologies.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\"\"On Thursday, July 30, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Commissioner for Patents Drew Hirshfeld<\/a> and other USPTO staff<\/a> updated attendees of IPWatchdog and LexisNexis\u2019 webinar, \u201cA Conversation with the Commissioner: A Look Inside Patent Processes at the USPTO<\/a>,\u201d on issues such as staffing, reopening plans, and upcoming new processes for routing patent applications.<\/p>\n

Hirshfeld explained that the Office is currently in phase one of reopening and at \u201cmaximum telework\u201d capacity. In March, the Office went to mandatory telework, but recently began allowing some employees\u2014up to a maximum of 100 at a time\u2014back in the office. This is a \u201cminuscule\u201d number compared to normal Office capacity, said Hirshfeld. There is no date set for the Office reopening to the general public.<\/p>\n

The USPTO\u2019s telework program is famously used by a large majority of staff, which allowed the office to seamlessly transition during the pandemic. In fact, the Office is trending at a slightly higher productivity than projected for the year before the pandemic, said Hirshfeld. However, he warned that there\u2019s likely to be a latent impact on productivity once the pandemic ends, as employees in general are not taking leave right now. \u201cThey\u2019re working more hours than they normally would, so there\u2019s likely to be a drop-off in productivity,\u201d Hirshfeld said. \u201cThis is not unique to the USPTO.\u201d<\/p>\n

The number of filings is slightly up, at 1.4%. Before March, filings were trending at a 4% increase over last year, so there has been a decrease, and compared to last year, there is a decrease of about 2.5%. \u201cWe\u2019re actively watching that,\u201d Hirshfeld said. Though he said the Office is \u201cin a good place,\u201d he also cautioned that patents are often a lagging indicator of changes to the economy, so there could be larger impacts down the road. Fee revenues are also slightly down, about 1.5% from what was projected for the year.<\/p>\n

IPWatchdog Founder and CEO, Gene Quinn, said the relatively mild decrease of 2.5% considering the dire circumstances did not surprise him, as, anecdotally, large companies tend to hunker down while small companies and individuals become more active. Hirshfeld did not have statistics on such trends but said he would get them. \u201cIf that\u2019s really what\u2019s going on that\u2019s good news for the future of America,\u201d Quinn said. \u201cCreative people take the opportunity to create, which could be a real silver lining message.\u201d<\/p>\n

Big Changes<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Hirshfeld queued up Jay Kramer, Group Director Patent Operations, Tech Center 2400, to explain some \u201cfoundational changes\u201d coming in October 2020. In 2010, the Office signed an agreement with the European Patent Office to adopt a Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) system, in a step toward international harmonization. About 50 other patent offices worldwide are using CPC.<\/p>\n

\"\"The new system will allow applications to be coded according to multiple disciplines, rather than just one, and will allow more flexibility to find examiners with the specific expertise in the technologies. These multiple symbols will create a \u201cclassification picture\u201d that can be matched with examiners\u2019 skills via their \u201cexaminer portfolio.\u201d The changes are expected to allow for better quality examination of applications.<\/p>\n

Asked by Megan McLoughlin<\/a>, Director of Product Management for LexisNexis IP, what will happen to the traditional \u201cart units\u201d at the USPTO, Kramer explained that, while they will certainly be fundamentally changed and arguably less needed, their primary focus, which is training and guidance from Supervisory Patent Examiners, will remain intact.<\/p>\n

To hear more on the upcoming changes at the USPTO, including how artificial intelligence technologies will be used for classification, listen to the full webinar here.<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

On Thursday, July 30, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Commissioner for Patents Drew Hirshfeld and other USPTO staff updated attendees of IPWatchdog and LexisNexis\u2019 webinar, \u201cA Conversation with the Commissioner: A Look Inside Patent Processes at the USPTO,\u201d on issues such as staffing, reopening plans, and upcoming new processes for routing patent applications.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":109908,"featured_media":123700,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"content-type":"","footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[5519,228,3,37020,41],"tags":[8571,4826,9684,4827,2012,49,71114,33,40,34,8568,8727],"yst_prominent_words":[71104,24249,71108,71106,71100,71109,71099,71102,71105,71110,71107,71101,23423,71112,71111,15991,15244,71113,71103,15975],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ipwatchdog.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/123697"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ipwatchdog.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ipwatchdog.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ipwatchdog.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/109908"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ipwatchdog.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=123697"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ipwatchdog.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/123697\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ipwatchdog.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/123700"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ipwatchdog.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=123697"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ipwatchdog.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=123697"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ipwatchdog.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=123697"},{"taxonomy":"yst_prominent_words","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ipwatchdog.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/yst_prominent_words?post=123697"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}