<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
        xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
        xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
        xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
        xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
        xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
        xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
        >
<channel>
        <title>IPWatchdog.com &#124; Patents &#38; Intellectual Property Law - Feed</title>
        <atom:link href="https://ipwatchdog.com/feed/partners/bardhele-pagenberg/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://ipwatchdog.com/</link>
        <description>Trusted on intellectual property law. News and commentary on patents, innovation policy, trade secrets, copyrights and trademarks.</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 21:32:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <language></language>
        <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        <generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
                        <item>
                        <title>Webinar: UPC Issues First Final Permanent SEP Injunction &#8211; Impact and Ramifications of Philips v. Belkin</title>
                        <link>https://ipwatchdog.com/bardehle-pagenberg-october-10-2025/</link>
                        <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2025 14:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
                        <dc:creator>Renee C. Quinn</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="false">https://ipwatchdog.com/?page_id=192866</guid>
                        <description><![CDATA[On October 3rd, the UPC Court of Appeal handed down the court’s first final judgment on the merits in re Philips vs Belkin. This UPC decision marks UPC history and is a true milestone for many reasons. First and foremost, it is the first injunction handed down by the UPC Court of Appeals on the merits. Second, the decision clarifies&#8230;]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[On October 3rd, the UPC Court of Appeal handed down the court’s first final judgment on the merits in re Philips vs Belkin. This UPC decision marks UPC history and is a true milestone for many reasons. First and foremost, it is the first injunction handed down by the UPC Court of Appeals on the merits. Second, the decision clarifies&#8230;]]></content:encoded>
                                                                </item>
                        <item>
                        <title>Webinar: The State of Play at the UPC from a US-Perspective &#8211; Insights from a UPC Litigator</title>
                        <link>https://ipwatchdog.com/event/webinar-bardehle-pagenberg-2024-01-17-the-state-of-play-at-the-upc-from-a-us-perspective/</link>
                        <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2024 21:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
                        <dc:creator>Kasia Kryca</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="false">https://ipwatchdog.com/?post_type=tribe_events&#038;p=171765</guid>
                        <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
                                                                </item>
                        <item>
                        <title>Panelists</title>
                        <link>https://ipwatchdog.com/bardehle-pagenberg-january-17-2024/panelists/</link>
                        <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2024 19:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
                        <dc:creator>Kasia Kryca</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="false">https://ipwatchdog.com/?page_id=171763</guid>
                        <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
                                                                </item>
                        <item>
                        <title>Webinar: The State of Play at the UPC from a US-Perspective &#8211; Insights from a UPC Litigator</title>
                        <link>https://ipwatchdog.com/bardehle-pagenberg-january-17-2024/</link>
                        <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2024 19:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
                        <dc:creator>Kasia Kryca</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="false">https://ipwatchdog.com/?page_id=171758</guid>
                        <description><![CDATA[The Unified Patent Court (UPC) is definitely a reality with almost 200 pending cases. The first substantive decisions were issued, and important trends are emerging. It has become quite clear that preliminary injunctions are readily available at the UPC, and the legal framework for obtaining interim relief is favorable for patentees. If the patentee is “good for the money”, such&#8230;]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[The Unified Patent Court (UPC) is definitely a reality with almost 200 pending cases. The first substantive decisions were issued, and important trends are emerging. It has become quite clear that preliminary injunctions are readily available at the UPC, and the legal framework for obtaining interim relief is favorable for patentees. If the patentee is “good for the money”, such&#8230;]]></content:encoded>
                                                                </item>
        </channel>
</rss>