Squires Emphasizes AI, Dubs Inherited Backlog ‘An Absolute Dumpster Fire’ and a ‘Betrayal’

“Squires noted that the backlog jumped from 576,103 in 2020 to 837,928 in January 2025, adding that this represents a ‘total betrayal of American inventors who deserve better.’”

SquiresU.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Director John Squires delivered his first public remarks on Friday, addressing a number of key issues he has been focused on during his first five weeks in office.

With respect to the Office’s backlog, he told attendees of the American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) Annual Meeting that his administration “inherited an unexamined patent application backlog that was an absolute dumpster fire.”

Squires noted that the backlog was at 837,928 unexamined applications on January 20 and that the number jumped from 576,103 in 2020 to 837,928 in January 2025, adding that this represents a “total betrayal of American inventors who deserve better.” The number today stands at 788,229, representing a reduction of about 50,000 applications since January.

The Office has also saved $315 million by reining in travel and reevaluating contracts, among other actions, which Squires said has resulted in “a full one-third of the reserves we’re now using to stay open and almost twice what I need to keep the Trademark Business Unit open into the new year.”

He listed some of the actions the Office is taking to further address the backlog as well, such as hiring 1,100 new examiners; launching the Streamlined Claim Set Pilot Program; and implementing new IT tools, including the AI-assisted Automated Search Pilot (ASAP!).

This focus on using AI in USPTO operations to improve examination quality and timing has been a priority of Squires’ since before he was confirmed. “With AI, there’s no excuse for missing prior art,” Squires said. He also noted that AI has resulted in “record-low trademark pendency,” and assisting the Trademarks Register Protection Office to remove around 61,000 invalid applications and registrations.

AI took the spotlight in Squires’ remarks generally, and he called it “the most transcendent and transformative technology of our time, perhaps of any time.”

He also told attendees that there is no need to overhaul the patent law to protect AI, as proper application of existing laws is sufficient to secure patent rights for technologies of the future. “Eligibility follows architecture,” Squires remarked, explaining that the Office will be looking for “the something more that Alice and Mayo tell us to look for” when it comes to eligibility analyses.

“When technology rewires how information flows, that’s when invention begins.” He pointed to the decision in Ex parte Desjardins, Appeal 2024-000567 (Decided September 26, 2025), as well as the first patents he signed—which were directed to distributed ledger/crypto and medical diagnostics technologies—as proof that the Office is committed to ensuring that transformative technologies remain eligible.

“If there is any one thing I am going to accomplish in my tenure, it’s this—making sure the door to the patent office is wide open to transformative technologies,” Squires said.

 

Share

Warning & Disclaimer: The pages, articles and comments on IPWatchdog.com do not constitute legal advice, nor do they create any attorney-client relationship. The articles published express the personal opinion and views of the author as of the time of publication and should not be attributed to the author’s employer, clients or the sponsors of IPWatchdog.com.

Join the Discussion

4 comments so far.

  • [Avatar for Seriously concerned]
    Seriously concerned
    November 3, 2025 01:16 pm

    Director Squires:

    We are thrilled by your nomination and the actions you have been taking.

    As I am sure you are aware, the other dumpster fires are SCOTUS trashing of patent law (because they know not what they do), and the Federal Circuit then making it infinitely worse by thoroughly misunderstanding, wildly expanding, and further trashing the patent mess created by SCOTUS. It seems that nearly all of them are determined to nearly thoroughly undermine the U.S. patent system, including also by Congress through awful revisions to patent law such as through the AIA and now through PERA. My hope is that you can take the lead to have the current Trump Administration, including the Justice Department and the PTO under your leadership, take action to put a stop to the madness, including PTO Examiners who have been similarly trashing patent rights and innovation they are intended to stimulate, including especially in the ubiquitous arena of computing and software.

    In that regard, why would anyone take the position that computing technology, whether hardware or software, is not “technical” and thus patent ineligible? As the Federal Circuit seemed to well understand long ago but seems to now have forgotten, a computer programmed to perform a new function is a new machine. And there is an unquestionable reason they call these technologies computer ENGINEERING and computer SCIENCE. Why would we deny patent protection, and resulting stimulation of innovation, for the resulting new machine simply because it is created by software rather than new hardware circuitry for example?

    I see the resulting and highly predictable terrible damage to American innovation and our economy every day in my patent practice.

    Please continue on to help undue the damage.

    Thank you!

    Now, I am also, finally, seriously hopeful.

  • [Avatar for Model 101]
    Model 101
    November 2, 2025 08:45 am

    The backlog is so big that I’ll be dead before my new applications are reviewed.

    If I finally get a patent, I’ll be vomiting in my grave after the patent is killed by Alice in litigation.

    This is the innovation landscape in America today.

    Great!!!

  • [Avatar for Pro Say]
    Pro Say
    October 31, 2025 08:50 pm

    “inherited an unexamined patent application backlog that was an absolute dumpster fire.”

    One word. One name. One reason.

    Vidal.

    “proper application of existing laws is sufficient to secure patent rights for technologies of the future.”

    Agreed. The greatest problem, you see, is a CAFC gone (eligibility) wild.

    (Great to see PTO leadership finally — finally — doing everything it (they) can to encourage and protect American innovation.)

  • [Avatar for bart]
    bart
    October 31, 2025 06:57 pm

    Regarding “the backlog jumping from 576,103 in 2020 to 837,928 in January 2025,” perhaps one should have focused on the actual responsibilities as USPTO Director rather than patting themselves on the back while saying “DEI” and traveling the world while taking selfies at the expense of patent applicants/owners, all while raising fees and introducing new ones. I think we all know who this was. Nothing to show for innovation at all, except for repeating a stupid phrase “innovation to impact.” Impact for who? Big tech?

Varsity Sponsors

Industry Events

Certified Patent Valuation Analyst Training
May 28 @ 9:00 am - May 29 @ 5:00 pm EDT
2026 WIPO-U.S. Summer School on Intellectual Property
June 1 @ 9:00 am - June 12 @ 1:45 pm EDT

From IPWatchdog