China releases new proposed amendments to patent laws

china-3d-map-large-335a Although the Chinese Patent Law is a mere 31 years old, it has already gone through 3 major revisions, the last being 6 years ago.  In its most recent effort, China just released the “Draft 4th Amendments to the Chinese Patent Law” for public comments, which are due by Jan 1, 2016.

The proposed amendments will significantly strengthen areas such as patent enforcement and broaden design patent protection.  Notable amendments include an increase of potential statutory damages from 1M RMB (US $155K) to 5M RMB (US $776K), the expansion of the scope of the Patent Administrative Department (PAD) to include enforcement provisions, and the new PAD ability to in some cases make rulings regarding Standard Essential Patents (SEPs).  Many, but not all, of these changes were seen months ago in the previous draft.

China Law Translate has kindly provided an English comparison between the old and new versions, which also details the 3 possible methods to submit comments.

In my view, some important changes include:

Design patents:

  • Partial designs are allowed (Art. 2).
  • Extension of design protection to 15 years (Art. 42).

Patents (i.e., Utility Patents and Utility Models):

  • Employers (more) clearly own inventions made by employee during the course of employment (Art. 6).
  • In the absence of a contract, where an inventor makes an invention using the resources of the employer (but presumably not within the course of employment), then the patent right belongs to the inventor (Art. 6).
  • Good-faith provision for patents (Art. 14).
  • Clarification of inventor remuneration as to employees during the course of their employment (Art. 16).
  • Clarification that patents may claim priority to a design patent with 6 months (Art. 29).
  • Shifting of the burden of proof for allegations of infringement for manufacturing method patents (Art. 60 – actually from previous Art. 61).
  • Joint liability established for manufacturers who knowingly-manufacture infringing goods as well as those who induce infringement (Art. 62).
  • Joint liability established for ISPs with actual knowledge or who reasonably should know their services are being used for infringing acts, and do not promptly stop them (Art. 63).
  • Enhanced damages (1-3X) for intentional infringement (Art. 68).
  • Statutory damages range increased to a maximum of 5M RMB (Art. 68).
  • Provision for court to determine damages if infringer fails to provide accounting, or provides a false accounting (Art. 68).


  • Enhanced administrative powers and responsibilities of the PAD (Art. 3).
  • Clarified that the Parent Review Board (PRB) may conduct reviews de novo, and is not limited to the appealed issue(s) (Art. 41, 46).
  • PAD may also handle patent disputes (Art. 60).
  • PAD may conduct infringement compensation mediation, and mediation awards may be enforced by a court (Art. 61).
  • PAD may order enhanced (1-5X) damages where illegal counterfeiting proceeds exceed 50K RMB.  For proceeds less than 50K RMB, the fine may be 250K RMB (Art. 66).
  • Enhanced criminal penalties for not cooperating with PAD investigations (Art. 67).
  • Establishment of a patent credit information archive and its integration into the national credit system (Art. 74).
  • PAD’s enhanced regulation of Patent Agents (Art. 75, 88).
  • PAD to promote patents and the system (Art. 79).
  • PAD to establish and promote a licensing announcement program (Art. 82-84).
  • PAD may (upon request) make a ruling relating to issues related to SEPs owned by members of standard-setting organizations (Art. 85).

I especially welcome the transparency with which this process is being carried out, although the timing for comments could be a bit longer, especially in light of the Holiday Season.  However, I suspect that the Chinese Government seeks to finish the comment process well before the Chinese New Year Holidays that begin in early February 2016.


Warning & Disclaimer: The pages, articles and comments on do not constitute legal advice, nor do they create any attorney-client relationship. The articles published express the personal opinion and views of the author as of the time of publication and should not be attributed to the author’s employer, clients or the sponsors of

Join the Discussion

One comment so far.

  • [Avatar for Jian Xu]
    Jian Xu
    December 21, 2015 01:11 am

    Thanks Michael for the quick update. I think the major changes of the proposed 4th amendment of China Patent Law can be summarized under the following three categories.

    Catergory 1: Patent subject matter and terms
    Partial designs
    15 years term for designs
    Medical diagnostic methods for farmed animals

    Category 2: Enforcement
    SIPO’s invalidation decision “quasi-final”
    Punitive damages
    E-commerce sites jointly liable
    No abuse of patent rights

    Category 3: Exploitation
    Licence of right
    Implied licence for undisclosed standard-essential patents

    For readers interested in China IP, you might find quite a lot of useful information at “NiuYie China IP” (, an online knowledge center for China IP.