The European Patent Office (EPO) welcomed the adoption by the European Parliament in Strasbourg of two draft regulations on the creation of the unitary patent, hailing it as a historic achievement. “The European Union is to be congratulated on this decision, which clears the way for the completion of the European patent system with a unitary patent and a Unified Patent Court, which we have been waiting for in Europe for 40 years,” said EPO President Benoît Battistelli. “The significant lowering of the cost of patenting inventions in Europe will strongly benefit European enterprises, especially research centres and SMEs. The vision of the founding fathers of the EPO to equip the European economy with a truly supranational patent system now can become a reality, strengthening Europe’s competitiveness.”
The European patent with unitary effect (unitary patent) in the 25 participating states is based on two regulations, one creating the instrument, and one on the applicable language regime for the new patent. The EPO has been entrusted by 25 EU member states to deliver and administer unitary patents. The third element of the package is the creation of a unified patent litigation system set up under an international convention establishing the Unified Patent Court (UPC), a specialised court with a first and an appeal instance with exclusive jurisdiction concerning infringement and validity questions related to unitary patents. The positive vote in the Parliament became possible after the EU member states endorsed the regulations in their Competitiveness Council meeting on Monday. The unitary patent now has to be formally adopted by the EU Council and the European Parliament, which is expected soon.
Request for unitary patents may be filed once the legal provisions for both the unitary patent and the UPC have entered into force. The agreement establishing the UPC is expected to be signed on 18 February 2013 and will enter into force once thirteen EU member states have ratified the package, including France, Germany and the UK. The EPO expects to validate the first unitary patent in 2014.
The unitary patent will provide legal protection for inventors in 25 EU member states through one single administrative step. It will co-exist with national patents and the classical European patent with which it shares the legal basis and the procedure for grant (as laid out in the European Patent Convention), and from which it differs only in the post-grant phase: Under the unitary patent scheme, the EPO will also be in charge of centrally administering the patent, levying the annual renewal fees and distributing them to the participating EU member states. The fact that unitary patents will be treated as a single patent no longer requiring to be validated (including translation) and administered nationally in each and every state, will lead to massive savings in terms of time and costs. This should make Europe more attractive for innovation and investors and bring it on a par with its competitors in Asia and the US.
Join the Discussion
3 comments so far.
Stan E. DeloDecember 14, 2012 04:35 am
Thanks for your considered and informed opinion Max. I feel somewhat the same about my erstwhile Congressfolks, who will be long gone before the real effects of the America Invents Act become painfully apparent. One aspect of the AIA that was oddly totally overlooked, was how much it was going to cost the practitioners to adapt to such a radical change in patent law. I heard one estimate of about a half billion or so here in the US, which will have to be paid for somehow.
MaxDreiDecember 14, 2012 02:51 am
Stan, when the Euro’s have implemented this stuff, and when you have got through to issuance of something out of the EPO, then it might have an effect on your costs.
The Euro pols around today boldly assert that they are reducing costs for small industry. But Europe’s patent practitioners are confidently asserting that it will explode costs for small industry. We (the practitioners) will be able to tell you more in about ten years from now. By then, the pols of today will have long since departed the scene of their mischief.
Stan E. DeloDecember 14, 2012 01:42 am
Does anyone have any ideas about how this might affect the cost of PCT filings leading to perhaps two foreign national stage decisions? In my case all of the three possible nations that may be of interest to me use the English language, so translation issues will be minimal I presume. In the case of filing in countries using other languages, might this reduce the need to hire practitioners in the elected countries?