Why Bipartisanship Matters

Betsy de Parry embraces Senator Bayh at 30th Anniversary Bayh-Dole celebration, December 2010.

Let me state the obvious: Cancer and every other illness affect people of all political persuasions. I suspect that most would agree, at least theoretically, that no illness should be politicized, but the fact is that decisions or lack of decisions made by Congress trickle down to the way we live every day. They include decisions that impact people who are impacted by cancer — which is why we need thoughtful leaders who are willing to work together.

History is replete with examples of bipartisanship that have had long-lasting, positive effects. A look at just one can teach us the critical need for bipartisanship in matters that relate to cancer and other health conditions.

Have you or a loved one taken Tamoxifen or Herceptin for breast cancer? How about Revlimid for multiple myeloma? Bexxar for non-Hodgkin lymphoma? Gleevec for chronic myelogenous leukemia? Did Neulasta ever keep you safe from infection while undergoing chemotherapy?

Then you have benefited from bipartisanship, because these and nearly 200 other drugs are available today as a result of the 96th Congress passing a little-known bill that laid the foundation for the development of therapies that have saved — literally — millions of lives, including mine and perhaps yours or that of someone you know or love. That bill became known as the Bayh-Dole Act.

Prior to its passage, the government retained the rights to federally-funded discoveries. Then, as now, the federal government was the largest single source of funds for basic research because basic research is generally too risky and too expensive for private industry to undertake alone.

But by retaining the rights to federally funded discoveries, taxpayers got no return on their investment because government is not in the business of turning discoveries into products that benefit people. That’s up to private industry, but private industry couldn’t commercialize discoveries to which they had no rights. As a result, discoveries languished as pieces of paper — i.e., patents — in government offices.

The Bayh-Dole Act unlocked those discoveries that were made with taxpayer money. It allowed businesses and nonprofits, such as universities, to retain title to their inventions that were made with federal funds and to license them to private companies for commercialization.

It was a brilliant piece of legislation that set the stage for commercializing hundreds of products, including life-saving treatments to which many of us cancer survivors owe our lives. As an added benefit, the Act has stimulated the formation of more than 5,000 companies and created hundreds of thousands of jobs since its passage.

The Bayh-Dole Act wound its way through Congress in 1980. Conservatism was sweeping the country. President Jimmy Carter was unpopular. Ronald Reagan won by a landslide.

Yet in that political climate, the bill passed in the lame duck session, and President Carter signed it into law on Dec. 12, 1980 — less than a year after it was introduced!

The bill was sponsored by Indiana Democrat Birch Bayh and Kansas Republican Bob Dole. It was co-sponsored by several others, including arch-liberal George McGovern and arch-conservative Strom Thurmond.

Despite polar opposite ideological views of the sponsors and co-sponsors and the fight for control of both houses of Congress in 1980, members of Congress set aside their differences and worked collaboratively to move this important piece of legislation forward.

Could this be done today, with partisanship on steroids? I wonder. Complex issues are spun into 30-second sound bytes and 140 characters. Compromise and collaboration are dirty words. Politicians put their own agendas ahead of ours and elections have become more about defeating the prevailing party than about solving the real issues that affect you and me.

If the 96th Congress had behaved the way some members of the current Congress — and many who wish to be in Congress — are behaving, it’s unlikely that many of us would be alive today because they simply wouldn’t have found common ground and passed legislation that paved the way for life-saving treatments. Instead, common sense prevailed in even the most conservative and liberal members, and as a result, lives have been saved and jobs created.

Sadly, such bipartisanship has become a thing of the past, but the 96th Congress proves that it is possible and the Bayh-Dole Act exemplifies why it matters.

There’s no doubt that our country faces a myriad of complex issues. As a national health concern, cancer is only one of them, and there is an immediate and pressing issue: major funding cuts for cancer research are looming. If allowed to take effect, progress will slow and that will cost lives, not to mention jobs. Is that what anyone wants?

I certainly hope not, but that’s exactly what we’ll get if Congress doesn’t act quickly to solve the problem. And that’s going to require bipartisanship that’s unlikely to be mustered if we choose to elect or re-elect politicians who are unwilling to collaborate with the other party regardless of human cost.

When the elections are over, I can only hope that they don’t result in more polarization. There are too many issues that we all want solved, but they won’t be solved by short-sighted obstructionists or extremists who have hijacked Washington and gripped it in gridlock. It will take more moderate representatives who are willing to collaborate with their colleagues regardless of party affiliation — who are willing to represent us, the people.

When we cast our votes next week, let’s take a deep breath, tune out the noise, nonsense and nastiness that has marked this election, and vote wisely. Let’s demand that Congress return to collaboration and common sense. It’s the only way that solutions are ever found. And too much is at stake to settle for less.

EDITOR’S NOTE: This article originally published on AnnArbor.com and is republished here with permission of the author.

Senator Birch Bayh (center) with cancer survivor Betsy de Parry (right) and her husband Alex (left).

About the Author

Betsy de Parry is a cancer survivor.  She has become a champion for cancer patients and for the benefits of Bayh-Dole.  In December 2010, she at the 30th anniversary celebration on Bayh-Dole, capping the moment when she turned to Senator Bayh and said: “Because of you, I’m alive today.”

Since her recovery from non-Hodgkin lymphoma, she has – with the help of her ever-present assistant Missy – penned two books and written numerous essays and articles, including her popular Candid Cancer column. He latest book is Adventures in Cancer Land, which provides some much needed wit, wisdom and inspiration for those suffering from cancer and their loved ones.  Find Betsy on Facebook.



Warning & Disclaimer: The pages, articles and comments on IPWatchdog.com do not constitute legal advice, nor do they create any attorney-client relationship. The articles published express the personal opinion and views of the author as of the time of publication and should not be attributed to the author’s employer, clients or the sponsors of IPWatchdog.com.

Join the Discussion

2 comments so far.

  • [Avatar for Blind Dogma]
    Blind Dogma
    November 4, 2012 09:38 pm

    …and on all thirty pieces of silver paid by the large Multinational Big Corp(se) that push for (and receive) the watering down of patent strength.

    Wondering where to find that coin? Have a chat with your congressman.

  • [Avatar for step back]
    step back
    November 4, 2012 07:28 am

    “Bi” (meaning only 2) -partisanship is a false choice menu.

    This world comes with more than just 2 kinds of people.

    That said, we are indeed entering into an anti-science, anti-research era.
    Nothing new about that.

    “We” did it in the Dark Ages also.
    The rise of voodoo magic thinking and the collapse of scientific reasoning.
    It’s happening on both sides of the N-partisanship coin.