<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>IPWatchdog.com &#124; Patents &#38; Patent Law &#187; dmca</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ipwatchdog.com/tag/dmca/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ipwatchdog.com</link>
	<description>Patents, Patent Applications, Patent Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 19:27:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Perfect 10 v. Google: Naked Pictures Copyright Case Continues</title>
		<link>http://ipwatchdog.com/2010/07/31/perfect-10-google-copyright/id=11849/</link>
		<comments>http://ipwatchdog.com/2010/07/31/perfect-10-google-copyright/id=11849/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 16:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central district of california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dmca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dmca take down]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perfect 10]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=11849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perfect 10, Inc., the former publisher of Perfect 10 Magazine, is back at it with Google over whether Google's display of certain images of scantily clad women infringes the copyrights owned by Perfect 10. Perfect 10 created and sold pictures of nude models through a now defunct print magazine, and now creates and sells pictures through a password-protected subscription website. Simultaneous actions are pending in both United States and Canada, each with recent rulings over the last two weeks, with a ruling in Canada on July 18, 2010, and a ruling on Google's motion for summary judgment in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on July 26, 2010.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ipwatchdog.com/2010/07/31/perfect-10-google-copyright/id=11849/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dow Jones Sues Briefing.com Alleging Copyright Infringement</title>
		<link>http://ipwatchdog.com/2010/04/28/dow-jones-sues-briefing-com-alleging-copyright-infringement/id=10332/</link>
		<comments>http://ipwatchdog.com/2010/04/28/dow-jones-sues-briefing-com-alleging-copyright-infringement/id=10332/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 03:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[briefing.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dmca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dow jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hot news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[southern district of new york]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair competition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=10332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ The complaint alleges that in some cases the republication and distribution occurs within a minute or two after the article is published by Dow Jones. In just one two-week period, Briefing.com copied a substantial portion of at least 100 articles and republished more than 70 headlines within three minutes of the initial publication on Dow Jones Newswires. Dow Jones alleges that this conduct violates Dow Jones' copyrights, amounts to "hot news" misappropriation, violates the DMCA and is otherwise unfair competition.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ipwatchdog.com/2010/04/28/dow-jones-sues-briefing-com-alleging-copyright-infringement/id=10332/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zoominfo&#8217;s Blatant Copyright Infringement</title>
		<link>http://ipwatchdog.com/2009/08/28/zoominfos-blatant-copyright-infringement/id=5374/</link>
		<comments>http://ipwatchdog.com/2009/08/28/zoominfos-blatant-copyright-infringement/id=5374/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 21:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dmca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dmca take down]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plagiarism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zoominfo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=5374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every once in a while we do an Internet search to find out what is out there quoting to IPWatchdog.com or me personally.  We also try and make sure that others are not infringing upon our works by republishing our content without permission.  It is flattering in one sense to have people want to steal [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ipwatchdog.com/2009/08/28/zoominfos-blatant-copyright-infringement/id=5374/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sample DMCA Take Down Letter</title>
		<link>http://ipwatchdog.com/2009/07/06/sample-dmca-take-down-letter/id=4501/</link>
		<comments>http://ipwatchdog.com/2009/07/06/sample-dmca-take-down-letter/id=4501/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dmca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dmca take down]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sample documents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=4501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It just came to my attention earlier today that someone had copied an entire article from IPWatchdog.com and posted it to their own website last week.  How is it possible that anyone doesn&#8217;t realize that you just cannot do that?  More likely, it is known that you cannot do that but people do it figuring [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ipwatchdog.com/2009/07/06/sample-dmca-take-down-letter/id=4501/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recording Industry Victory in Usenet File Sharing Case</title>
		<link>http://ipwatchdog.com/2009/07/02/recording-industry-victory-in-usenet-file-sharing-case/id=4390/</link>
		<comments>http://ipwatchdog.com/2009/07/02/recording-industry-victory-in-usenet-file-sharing-case/id=4390/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Fantino</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPWatchdog.com Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dmca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[file sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lisa fantino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recording industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usenet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=4390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The recording industry has scored gold in its court battle with Usenet, which advertises itself as a massive online file sharing community.    See:   Arista Records v. Usenet, 07 Civ. 8822 (S.D.N.Y.  June 30, 2009) The case, filed back in 2007, pitted the record companies against Usenet, with the recording [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ipwatchdog.com/2009/07/02/recording-industry-victory-in-usenet-file-sharing-case/id=4390/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
