http://www.ipwatchdog.com
Today's Date: September 3, 2010 Home | Contact | Services | Patent Attorney | Patent Search | Patent Application | Confidentiality Agreements | Recommendations

Articles by Gene Quinn


Written by Gene Quinn
President & Founder of IPWatchdog, Inc.
Patent Attorney, Reg. No. 44,294
Posted: January 5, 2008 @ 1:05 pm
Page viewed 6,173 times
View Gene Quinn's profile on LinkedIn
  Tell A Friend!


On the Agenda: US Patent Reform for 2007 (Patent World February 2007)

Not So Fast: Hurdles to An International Patent System (Patent World December/January 2007)

The Right Solution? USPTO Information Disclosure Proposal (Patent World November 2006)

Testing Question: KSR v. Teleflex (Patent World October 2006)

ANDA What Should We Do? (Patent World September 2006)

Simon Says: You Figure it Out (Patent World, July/August 2006)

What’s the Use of Calendars? (Patent World, June 2006)

Halting the Sands of Time: JPEG Patent Reexamined (Patent World, May 2006)

The Never Ending Story: RIM & NTP Not Backing Down (Patent World, April 2006)

All Together Now: The Need For An EU Wide Patent System (Patent World, March 2006)

Jumping In: The US Supreme Court Makes Its Presence Felt (Patent World, February 2006)

Goodbye To Paper: The USPTO Goes Electronic (Patent World, January 2006)

In Defence: Arguing The Benefit of Software Patents (Patent World, November 2005)

Fresh Coat of Paint: The US Patent Office Revises Reexamination (Patent World, October 2005)

Summer Blockbuster: Fed Circuit Clarifies Claim Construction (Patent World, September 2005)

Who Wins? Grokster At The Supreme Court (Copyright World, September 2005)

Weighing In: Supreme Court Has Its Say On The Safe Harbor (Patent World, August 2005)

Radical Reform: The Senate Urged to Reform US Patent System (Patent World, June 2005)

Nearing the End: The Software Directive Through US Eyes (Patent World, May 2005)

Waiting For Grokster: The Supreme Court Considers File-Sharing (Patent World, May 2005)

Free For All? The Rise and Rise of the Open Source Movement (Patent World, April 2005)

Is the Sky Falling? Introducing Product Patents in India (Patent World, March 2005)

What is Intellectual Property? (Patent World, March 2005)

Misinforming the Public: How the Press Got Blackberry Wrong (Patent World, February 2005)

Lacking Bite: The Duty Of Candour In A Shambles (Patent World, January 2005)

Columbia University’s Retread Patent Scheme (Patent World, December 2004)

Clash of the IP Titans: Sun Settles Java Litigation (Patent World, November 2004)

Unequal Partners (Patent World, October 2004)

Playing Patentopoly: Insurance Funding For Businesses (Patent World, September 2004)

A Slow Death? Killing The Doctrine Of Equivalents (Patent World, August 2004)

The Great Divide: Has Microsoft Abused Its Market Position? (Patent World, June 2004)

Tinkering With USPTO Practice (Patent World, May 2004)

The Billion Dollar Carrot: Help On The Way For The USPTO (Patent World, April 2004)

Inequitable Conduct: Hiding Out In The Open (Patent World, March 2004)

Only Themselves To Blame: The RIAA’s Last Stand (JURIST, September 2003)

Dastar v. Fox: Public Domain Wins In Supreme Court (JURIST, June 2003)

Affordable Drugs Vs The Incentive To Invent: The Maine Rx Case (JURIST, May 2003)

Victoria’s Secret and the Redefinition of Dilution (JURIST, March 2003)

Eldred V. Ashcroft: Looking for the Bright Side (JURIST, January 2003)

An Unconstitutional Patent In Disguise (2003)

Legal Issues in Building Course Websites (2003)

Abusing IP Rights In Cyberspace: Patent Misuse Revisited (2002)

The Proliferation of Electronic Commerce Patents (2002)

Web Surfing 101: The Evolving Law of Hyperlinking (2001)

Evolution of Internet Jurisdiction: What A Long Strange Trip It Has Been (2000)

Tax Implications for Electronic Commerce Over The Internet (2000)

Using Alternative Dispute Resolution to Resolve Patent Litigation (1999)



Software Patent Attorney
Gene Quinn, US Patent Attorney

US Patent Law Basics
Everything You Need to Know to Get Started



ABOUT LAMBERT & LAMBERT

 

Lambert & Lambert, Inc. (L&L) is an international license agency that represents independent inventors and product developers with innovative inventions and technologies.  As one of the premier license agencies, and among only a few that work on contingency, L&L's goal is to commercialize their client’s products by placing them with a manufacturer who is well positioned to sell the product in large quantities.  With products currently selling in stores such as Walmart®, Target®, ToysRUs®, and many more, L&L has a proven track record of success.


Lambert & Lambert is also a proud Professional Member of the United Inventors Association, the Better Business Bureau, the MN Inventors Congress, Licensing Executives Society and has been recognized by the National Inventor Fraud Center as "Official Good Guys".

 

Learn more at:

www.lambertinvent.com

 

Email us at:

info@lambertinvent.com

Lambert & Lambert, Inc.

7616 Currell Blvd, Suite 200

St. Paul, MN  55125  USA

Tel: 651-552-0080

Fax: 651-552-7678

 

L&L has also documented its system of licensing products, called "Invent Secrets", for inventors who want to do it themselves.  It can be found online at www.inventsecrets.com. Additionally, L&L has also created a new website for inventors to display their inventions or submit directly to companies in search of new products at www.inventspark.com.