<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple Strong Q4, Will Windows 7 Cause Apple Setback?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ipwatchdog.com/2009/10/19/apple-strong-q4-will-windows-7-cause-apple-setback/id=6726/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ipwatchdog.com/2009/10/19/apple-strong-q4-will-windows-7-cause-apple-setback/id=6726/</link>
	<description>Patents, Patent Applications, Patent Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 16:11:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jaime</title>
		<link>http://ipwatchdog.com/2009/10/19/apple-strong-q4-will-windows-7-cause-apple-setback/id=6726/#comment-12894</link>
		<dc:creator>jaime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 11:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=6726#comment-12894</guid>
		<description>Tastes apart, my experience with Vista is not so bad, at least in comparison with the other Windows releases and also with some of the Mac previous OSs. Maybe we have passed so many nightmares that are now conformists... but understand me well I have seen nightmare problems the same horrible both in PC and Mac. I have now a Vista 2GB portable where I spent too much time and never had any issues with peripherals or networks, including routers, Wifi, printers, hard disks etc. Also the compatibility with newest and also older video and audio formats is much better in my experience than the XP SP3 that I use in my office, for example Vista read more and better rare non autorun DVD formats would like to know if it is possible and will worth Win-7.

Anyway I have to buy a desktop now and I would like from an objective user if he recommends PC or Mac thinking in the best way to pass to 64 bits and the RAM limitations that I suppose will soon affect to the 32bit machines without troubles, being able as I need to have access to some multimedia resources with some flexibility (in this I am totally lost in view of the XP and Vista control panels in comparison with the maybe outdated, but at least for me more accessible and comprehensible previous OSs multimedia control) and of course hoping that most of the time to work with a computer tool is not to devote to the computer itself but to the thing you have to do.

Thanks, for what I can learn here...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tastes apart, my experience with Vista is not so bad, at least in comparison with the other Windows releases and also with some of the Mac previous OSs. Maybe we have passed so many nightmares that are now conformists&#8230; but understand me well I have seen nightmare problems the same horrible both in PC and Mac. I have now a Vista 2GB portable where I spent too much time and never had any issues with peripherals or networks, including routers, Wifi, printers, hard disks etc. Also the compatibility with newest and also older video and audio formats is much better in my experience than the XP SP3 that I use in my office, for example Vista read more and better rare non autorun DVD formats would like to know if it is possible and will worth Win-7.</p>
<p>Anyway I have to buy a desktop now and I would like from an objective user if he recommends PC or Mac thinking in the best way to pass to 64 bits and the RAM limitations that I suppose will soon affect to the 32bit machines without troubles, being able as I need to have access to some multimedia resources with some flexibility (in this I am totally lost in view of the XP and Vista control panels in comparison with the maybe outdated, but at least for me more accessible and comprehensible previous OSs multimedia control) and of course hoping that most of the time to work with a computer tool is not to devote to the computer itself but to the thing you have to do.</p>
<p>Thanks, for what I can learn here&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene Quinn</title>
		<link>http://ipwatchdog.com/2009/10/19/apple-strong-q4-will-windows-7-cause-apple-setback/id=6726/#comment-8827</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 17:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=6726#comment-8827</guid>
		<description>His Irateness-

Openly hostile for no reason?  You must be referring to Mac haters, not me.  The only reason that someone would think that what I say is unreasonable is if they have never used a machine with a Microsoft OS.  Microsoft has gotten worse over the years, more problems, more of a hog on resources, more security flaws and then Vista flat out was not compatible with much of anything.  I am not going to waste any more time with Microsoft.  

As far as paying 75% more for a machine that does 25-50% less, I think you left off the &quot;1&quot; and mistakenly used the word &quot;less,&quot; because surely you meant &quot;125-150% more!&quot;  On top of that, the computers I purchase with MS operating systems have never been cheaper than an Apple machine.  I don&#039;t buy the cheap stuff, so if I am going to pay the same price I would rather have a machine that works.  The only reason I haven&#039;t done this previously is because I have so much invested in peripherals and software, but since those are not compatible might as well get a machine that works.

Like the new Mac commercials so appropriately say, the hype associated with Windows 7 has all been heard before, and there are always problems.  So do yourself a favor and take this opportunity to move over to a Mac!

-Gene</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>His Irateness-</p>
<p>Openly hostile for no reason?  You must be referring to Mac haters, not me.  The only reason that someone would think that what I say is unreasonable is if they have never used a machine with a Microsoft OS.  Microsoft has gotten worse over the years, more problems, more of a hog on resources, more security flaws and then Vista flat out was not compatible with much of anything.  I am not going to waste any more time with Microsoft.  </p>
<p>As far as paying 75% more for a machine that does 25-50% less, I think you left off the &#8220;1&#8243; and mistakenly used the word &#8220;less,&#8221; because surely you meant &#8220;125-150% more!&#8221;  On top of that, the computers I purchase with MS operating systems have never been cheaper than an Apple machine.  I don&#8217;t buy the cheap stuff, so if I am going to pay the same price I would rather have a machine that works.  The only reason I haven&#8217;t done this previously is because I have so much invested in peripherals and software, but since those are not compatible might as well get a machine that works.</p>
<p>Like the new Mac commercials so appropriately say, the hype associated with Windows 7 has all been heard before, and there are always problems.  So do yourself a favor and take this opportunity to move over to a Mac!</p>
<p>-Gene</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: His Irateness</title>
		<link>http://ipwatchdog.com/2009/10/19/apple-strong-q4-will-windows-7-cause-apple-setback/id=6726/#comment-8826</link>
		<dc:creator>His Irateness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 16:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=6726#comment-8826</guid>
		<description>You seem to be -very- openly hostile to Windows, and Microsoft in general, for no particularly discernible reason other than, perhaps, a strange &quot;David vs. Goliath&quot; syndrome.  You&#039;ve consistently criticized MS for being slow and unwieldy but you, just on the cusp of what could be a tipping point in the &quot;OS Wars&quot; (a term I&#039;ve long since given up on, both OS&#039;s have always had their niches and always will; only if you&#039;re a heavy user in one field can you determine which OS; Mac, UNIX, LINUX, Windows or Amiga is actually better for you) you&#039;re switching to what could be the loosing side...

...5 years after the abandoned some of their dumber business practices and their more insidious side has started to show clearly through.  You might ALSO wanna look at the premier Office suite for Mac a little more closely; Redmond has it&#039;s mark on the Apple platform too, and has had it for years so you&#039;re not going to escape their &quot;clutches&quot; as easily as just switching OS&#039;s.

For someone who encourages innovation you might also wanna look at what Apple does if you try and use their OS on other hardware; say, a processor that wasn&#039;t made by Intel.

Have fun paying 75% more for a machine that does 25-50% less!  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You seem to be -very- openly hostile to Windows, and Microsoft in general, for no particularly discernible reason other than, perhaps, a strange &#8220;David vs. Goliath&#8221; syndrome.  You&#8217;ve consistently criticized MS for being slow and unwieldy but you, just on the cusp of what could be a tipping point in the &#8220;OS Wars&#8221; (a term I&#8217;ve long since given up on, both OS&#8217;s have always had their niches and always will; only if you&#8217;re a heavy user in one field can you determine which OS; Mac, UNIX, LINUX, Windows or Amiga is actually better for you) you&#8217;re switching to what could be the loosing side&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;5 years after the abandoned some of their dumber business practices and their more insidious side has started to show clearly through.  You might ALSO wanna look at the premier Office suite for Mac a little more closely; Redmond has it&#8217;s mark on the Apple platform too, and has had it for years so you&#8217;re not going to escape their &#8220;clutches&#8221; as easily as just switching OS&#8217;s.</p>
<p>For someone who encourages innovation you might also wanna look at what Apple does if you try and use their OS on other hardware; say, a processor that wasn&#8217;t made by Intel.</p>
<p>Have fun paying 75% more for a machine that does 25-50% less!  <img src='http://ipwatchdog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://ipwatchdog.com/2009/10/19/apple-strong-q4-will-windows-7-cause-apple-setback/id=6726/#comment-8776</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 18:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=6726#comment-8776</guid>
		<description>@Max

Windows 7 - Best operating system of all time..&quot;

Let me guess - you held a Windows 7 release party.   How much of the &quot;best os in the world&quot; koolaid did you serve up? 

&quot;people who required notebook had to go with Mac&quot;
What?  If they were using Windows, they could&#039;ve stuck with XP in their notebook.   
 
You sound like a Windows apologist that has never even touched a Mac.  While Snow Leopard may have been an update, it focuses on improving performance, efficiency and reducing its overall memory footprint compared to its predecessor Mac OS X v10.5 &quot;Leopard&quot;, rather than new end-user features. In some cases, as much as 7 gigs were freed up after the upgrade.  While there are a few interface tweaks and additions, there is improvement in the 64 bit architecture, MS Exchange Support added, and improvements in the use of multicore processors.   Besides, the quality of Leopard means that Snow Leopard did not need the the kind of major overhaul that is Windows 7.  In my book, puts Snow Leopard well ahead of Windows 7.  Enjoy your Vista Service Pack 7.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Max</p>
<p>Windows 7 &#8211; Best operating system of all time..&#8221;</p>
<p>Let me guess &#8211; you held a Windows 7 release party.   How much of the &#8220;best os in the world&#8221; koolaid did you serve up? </p>
<p>&#8220;people who required notebook had to go with Mac&#8221;<br />
What?  If they were using Windows, they could&#8217;ve stuck with XP in their notebook.   </p>
<p>You sound like a Windows apologist that has never even touched a Mac.  While Snow Leopard may have been an update, it focuses on improving performance, efficiency and reducing its overall memory footprint compared to its predecessor Mac OS X v10.5 &#8220;Leopard&#8221;, rather than new end-user features. In some cases, as much as 7 gigs were freed up after the upgrade.  While there are a few interface tweaks and additions, there is improvement in the 64 bit architecture, MS Exchange Support added, and improvements in the use of multicore processors.   Besides, the quality of Leopard means that Snow Leopard did not need the the kind of major overhaul that is Windows 7.  In my book, puts Snow Leopard well ahead of Windows 7.  Enjoy your Vista Service Pack 7.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene Quinn</title>
		<link>http://ipwatchdog.com/2009/10/19/apple-strong-q4-will-windows-7-cause-apple-setback/id=6726/#comment-8725</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=6726#comment-8725</guid>
		<description>Facts You Need to Check-

You say that you are a: &quot;writer for a widely-read computer website&quot;

You don&#039;t say?  Really?  I would never have guessed that to be the case in a million years!  You prove my point.  Thank you.

You say: &quot;it seems that there are not many readers&quot;

Believe what you want, but in this niche I have far more readers than most, and whether you like it or not this is an extremely influential blog that readers a readership you couldn&#039;t possibly imagine.

I think it is clear who needs to do some fact checking.

-Gene</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Facts You Need to Check-</p>
<p>You say that you are a: &#8220;writer for a widely-read computer website&#8221;</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t say?  Really?  I would never have guessed that to be the case in a million years!  You prove my point.  Thank you.</p>
<p>You say: &#8220;it seems that there are not many readers&#8221;</p>
<p>Believe what you want, but in this niche I have far more readers than most, and whether you like it or not this is an extremely influential blog that readers a readership you couldn&#8217;t possibly imagine.</p>
<p>I think it is clear who needs to do some fact checking.</p>
<p>-Gene</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fact Checker</title>
		<link>http://ipwatchdog.com/2009/10/19/apple-strong-q4-will-windows-7-cause-apple-setback/id=6726/#comment-8724</link>
		<dc:creator>Fact Checker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=6726#comment-8724</guid>
		<description>And, Yes, I am getting paid by Microsoft to visit blogs and defend their OS because with two days until Windows 7&#039;s launch, they have nothing better to do....brilliant!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, Yes, I am getting paid by Microsoft to visit blogs and defend their OS because with two days until Windows 7&#8217;s launch, they have nothing better to do&#8230;.brilliant!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fact Checker</title>
		<link>http://ipwatchdog.com/2009/10/19/apple-strong-q4-will-windows-7-cause-apple-setback/id=6726/#comment-8723</link>
		<dc:creator>Fact Checker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=6726#comment-8723</guid>
		<description>Genie,

Apparently you haven&#039;t heard that Microsoft allowed any users the oppurtunity to test Windows 7 before launch, something you won&#039;t see Apple doing anytime soon. I don&#039;t have to defend Vista to a Machoholic, you&#039;ve made up your opinion about Microsoft. Luckily, it seems that there are not many readers or commenters here, so your anti-Windows rubbish will reach very few. As a writer for a widely-read computer website, I think you&#039;d be curious to know that I consistently receive nothing but praise concerning Windows 7 from both Mac fanboys and Windows users. I guess not everybody who uses a Mac is as biased as you appear to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Genie,</p>
<p>Apparently you haven&#8217;t heard that Microsoft allowed any users the oppurtunity to test Windows 7 before launch, something you won&#8217;t see Apple doing anytime soon. I don&#8217;t have to defend Vista to a Machoholic, you&#8217;ve made up your opinion about Microsoft. Luckily, it seems that there are not many readers or commenters here, so your anti-Windows rubbish will reach very few. As a writer for a widely-read computer website, I think you&#8217;d be curious to know that I consistently receive nothing but praise concerning Windows 7 from both Mac fanboys and Windows users. I guess not everybody who uses a Mac is as biased as you appear to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene Quinn</title>
		<link>http://ipwatchdog.com/2009/10/19/apple-strong-q4-will-windows-7-cause-apple-setback/id=6726/#comment-8719</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=6726#comment-8719</guid>
		<description>Fact Checker-

Believe what you want, but I am a Vista user and I hate Vista.  I know no one who has used Vista that likes Vista.  The fact that there are any supporters of the obviously flawed Vista is astounding.  Are you all getting paid by Microsoft to go around and promote Vista and Windows 7?

Others can believe what they want, but it is extraordinarily curious that folks are saying how wonderful Windows 7 is and how they have used it and love it even BEFORE it has been released.  So either they are lying or they for some reason had access to Windows 7 prior to release, which would suggest they are beta testers, tech reviewers or Microsoft cronies who were given early copies for the purpose of promoting the release.

I will also just point out &quot;Fact Checker&quot; that you did not address any of the flaws I mentioned in my response to Toby.  So your comment here is really much ado about nothing, and not based on any factual reality.

-Gene</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fact Checker-</p>
<p>Believe what you want, but I am a Vista user and I hate Vista.  I know no one who has used Vista that likes Vista.  The fact that there are any supporters of the obviously flawed Vista is astounding.  Are you all getting paid by Microsoft to go around and promote Vista and Windows 7?</p>
<p>Others can believe what they want, but it is extraordinarily curious that folks are saying how wonderful Windows 7 is and how they have used it and love it even BEFORE it has been released.  So either they are lying or they for some reason had access to Windows 7 prior to release, which would suggest they are beta testers, tech reviewers or Microsoft cronies who were given early copies for the purpose of promoting the release.</p>
<p>I will also just point out &#8220;Fact Checker&#8221; that you did not address any of the flaws I mentioned in my response to Toby.  So your comment here is really much ado about nothing, and not based on any factual reality.</p>
<p>-Gene</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fact Checker</title>
		<link>http://ipwatchdog.com/2009/10/19/apple-strong-q4-will-windows-7-cause-apple-setback/id=6726/#comment-8718</link>
		<dc:creator>Fact Checker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=6726#comment-8718</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m gonna have to agree with Toby. None of this is substantiated. Most people who actually used Vista and didn&#039;t just read blogs about others who bash it, but didn&#039;t use it themselves, found it a more-than-suitable OS. It&#039;s quite obvious that Gene has an issue with Microsoft and that it has nothing to do with their product. Try to actually do research on this subject instead of watching the Vista-bashing &quot;I&#039;m a Mac&quot; TV spots and gaining all of your subject matter from 30 sec unreliable smear ads. Windows 7 is a great OS and if your judgement is too clouded to swallow your pride and admit this, then why are you writing tech articles? I have used Vista and Mac OSX Leopard and service pack Snow Leopard and Windows 7 is the real deal and Apple-only users will have to get used to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m gonna have to agree with Toby. None of this is substantiated. Most people who actually used Vista and didn&#8217;t just read blogs about others who bash it, but didn&#8217;t use it themselves, found it a more-than-suitable OS. It&#8217;s quite obvious that Gene has an issue with Microsoft and that it has nothing to do with their product. Try to actually do research on this subject instead of watching the Vista-bashing &#8220;I&#8217;m a Mac&#8221; TV spots and gaining all of your subject matter from 30 sec unreliable smear ads. Windows 7 is a great OS and if your judgement is too clouded to swallow your pride and admit this, then why are you writing tech articles? I have used Vista and Mac OSX Leopard and service pack Snow Leopard and Windows 7 is the real deal and Apple-only users will have to get used to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Orleans Computer Repair</title>
		<link>http://ipwatchdog.com/2009/10/19/apple-strong-q4-will-windows-7-cause-apple-setback/id=6726/#comment-8716</link>
		<dc:creator>New Orleans Computer Repair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=6726#comment-8716</guid>
		<description>The real question: Will iPhone rain on Windows 7 parade?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real question: Will iPhone rain on Windows 7 parade?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://ipwatchdog.com/2009/10/19/apple-strong-q4-will-windows-7-cause-apple-setback/id=6726/#comment-8713</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 01:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=6726#comment-8713</guid>
		<description>I have used Windows 7 Beta version and I think its great. Win 7 is the best operating system of all time. I also think its much better than Snow Leopard. I have stopped using my Mac notebook since I installed Win-7.

One more thing I don&#039;t think that Win 7 release will help Apple&#039;s sales in fact I think its gonna hurt in the notebook sales. Vista wasn&#039;t good with notebook and Linux isn&#039;t use friendly, that&#039;s why lots of people switched to Apple, people who required notebook had to go with Mac. But now things has changed. Windows 7 works fine with notebook, so nobody needs to spend  $1,100 on Mac when they can get much faster notebook with Windows 7 on half the price. Its just common sense specially in this tough economic time. Why would someone who isn&#039;t die hard Mac fan will buy it when notebook with Win 7 is available on half the price.

Besides new version on Snow Leopard sucks, its more like a Service Pack, which Microsoft offers as free upgrade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have used Windows 7 Beta version and I think its great. Win 7 is the best operating system of all time. I also think its much better than Snow Leopard. I have stopped using my Mac notebook since I installed Win-7.</p>
<p>One more thing I don&#8217;t think that Win 7 release will help Apple&#8217;s sales in fact I think its gonna hurt in the notebook sales. Vista wasn&#8217;t good with notebook and Linux isn&#8217;t use friendly, that&#8217;s why lots of people switched to Apple, people who required notebook had to go with Mac. But now things has changed. Windows 7 works fine with notebook, so nobody needs to spend  $1,100 on Mac when they can get much faster notebook with Windows 7 on half the price. Its just common sense specially in this tough economic time. Why would someone who isn&#8217;t die hard Mac fan will buy it when notebook with Win 7 is available on half the price.</p>
<p>Besides new version on Snow Leopard sucks, its more like a Service Pack, which Microsoft offers as free upgrade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene Quinn</title>
		<link>http://ipwatchdog.com/2009/10/19/apple-strong-q4-will-windows-7-cause-apple-setback/id=6726/#comment-8712</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene Quinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 01:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=6726#comment-8712</guid>
		<description>Toby-

Problems with Vista?  Don&#039;t tell me you are a Microsoft defender?  No need to Google anything.  Vista is horribly flawed as an operating system for many, many reasons, including the fact that cut and paste does not reliably work, Internet Explorer crashes constantly, many peripherals are not compatible with Vista, much software is not compatible with Vista, customized software business software I need for patent searching is not compatible with Vista, Vista machines have destroyed several external hard drives, Vista machines have destroyed a series of wireless mice and a series of keyboards, Toshiba prevents access to be able to downgrade from Vista, there are extreme security holes, Vista unnecessarily hogs tremendous resources and on and on and on...

If you need me to explain the problems of Vista you obviously have never used a Vista machine, or perhaps you have never used a non-Vista machine, thereby having nothing to compare to.  

I have no intention of paying $2,000 for a computer, and thankfully that will not be necessary when I purchase an Apple.  I will, however, get a computer that will last for many years longer than a PC using the MS operating system de jour.  

So tell me, why exactly does my preference for an Apple computer or just a computer that reliably works without bugs cause you so much distress?  

-Gene</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Toby-</p>
<p>Problems with Vista?  Don&#8217;t tell me you are a Microsoft defender?  No need to Google anything.  Vista is horribly flawed as an operating system for many, many reasons, including the fact that cut and paste does not reliably work, Internet Explorer crashes constantly, many peripherals are not compatible with Vista, much software is not compatible with Vista, customized software business software I need for patent searching is not compatible with Vista, Vista machines have destroyed several external hard drives, Vista machines have destroyed a series of wireless mice and a series of keyboards, Toshiba prevents access to be able to downgrade from Vista, there are extreme security holes, Vista unnecessarily hogs tremendous resources and on and on and on&#8230;</p>
<p>If you need me to explain the problems of Vista you obviously have never used a Vista machine, or perhaps you have never used a non-Vista machine, thereby having nothing to compare to.  </p>
<p>I have no intention of paying $2,000 for a computer, and thankfully that will not be necessary when I purchase an Apple.  I will, however, get a computer that will last for many years longer than a PC using the MS operating system de jour.  </p>
<p>So tell me, why exactly does my preference for an Apple computer or just a computer that reliably works without bugs cause you so much distress?  </p>
<p>-Gene</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toby</title>
		<link>http://ipwatchdog.com/2009/10/19/apple-strong-q4-will-windows-7-cause-apple-setback/id=6726/#comment-8709</link>
		<dc:creator>Toby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipwatchdog.com/?p=6726#comment-8709</guid>
		<description>And what exactly are your complaints about Vista? It sounds like you&#039;ve synthesized a whole bunch of vague internet criticisms and incorporated them as your own. If you have to Google this question to give an answer, don&#039;t bother. Rather hurry off to your Mac so you can pay $2k to check your e-mails, browse the web and edit photos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And what exactly are your complaints about Vista? It sounds like you&#8217;ve synthesized a whole bunch of vague internet criticisms and incorporated them as your own. If you have to Google this question to give an answer, don&#8217;t bother. Rather hurry off to your Mac so you can pay $2k to check your e-mails, browse the web and edit photos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
